Zzippy wrote: » What's he done now?
Clegg wrote: » Yeah I don't follow it closely because it is bad for my mental health if I go through it page by page. Especially with the muck being posted. It's Journal comments section tier.
awec wrote: » Honestly just ignore it. There are a few posters in that forum doing their best to try and make everyone as miserable as they are. I check every few days and the same posters are posting the same rubbish.
molloyjh wrote: » Its also worth remembering that 85% of tests are coming back as negative too. Is the actual number of cases higher? Yes. But that's always, always going to be the way of it. It's just a reality that we cant test everyone in a short space of time. We're doing as good a job as can be expected and the real positive for me is just how seriously we as a society have taken the restrictions and been, by and large, really good at implementing them. Seeing business reacting well to the situation has been very positive too. We're getting a roast pork dinner delivered tomorrow by a local chef that sounds unbelievably good! Hes a caterer by trade but obviously the need for a caterer is all but gone so hes adapting and doing a delivery service instead. And people are buying into that stuff and being really supportive and appreciative of the efforts of people like that. The virus itself is a little scary, especially if you or someone you know is in the high risk category. But amid all that theres been so many positives too, in terms of people and how we've dealt with it all and in terms of the leadership we've seen throughout. This will pass. But the lessons and positives we take from it could make a really positive difference going forward.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I spent some time looking at local news last night in the US as opposed to the national media we are accustomed to here. Frustration among state politicians and governors has turned to seething anger at the administration. Putting Kushner in charge of medical distribution is a bad bad joke and no one is laughing. As things stand the federal stockpile is being distributed politically and not on a need basis. States are on their own and there is going to be consequences after all this is over. A white house staffer has been put in charge of oversight of bailout funds which means that they don't want oversight and that money will be lost to corruption and they've fired their intelligence oversight position. This is all at the very outset when their aren't overwhelmed with the sick and dieing. Gun sales are through the roof and the country is singularly divided. I see few positive outcomes and many legitimately terrible ones.
[Deleted User] wrote: » At this point I'm honestly thinking it would be immoral for me ever to travel to the states again as I don't want to support what is going on over there
Stheno wrote: » I've worked with Americans in the past who have scripture quotes in their email signs Usually of the "repent or you will die a miserable death" variety It had an incredible affect on my view of them
Panda Killa wrote: » His popularity amongst the people..esp southern states is at an all-time high...even questioning anything he does gets you called a commie liberal
sydthebeat wrote: » panic pornmunchers
Yeah_Right wrote: » I love it. So accurately describes some my wife's family. I've can't count how many times I've thought about leaving the family WhatsApp group due to some of the ****e they forward.
Neil3030 wrote: » All jokes aside this raises an important question for me. What is the cognitive/neural/evolutionary mechanism that prohibits us from: "Well look at that, this person is just plain wrong. Anyway, on I go with my day. <whistles cheerfully>"
Deleted User wrote: » I think part of the problem is that people who have interesting and informed things to say don't bother to say them on social media as it's a negative and willful audience for the most part so why bother. There are plenty of people I know who I would consider intelligent, informed and excellent communicators but do I ever see them debating on facebook? No.
Panda Killa wrote: » It's the Coronavirus /5g link that is driving me loopy at the moment...5g caused Coronavirus ..and they can offer proof!!... *Delete & block*
Neil3030 wrote: » So why so much frustration when these views conflict with either our opinions or outright fact? We know these are not the people we should be listening to anyway, yet still we're compelled to engage...
sydthebeat wrote: » The mute button on WhatsApp is the best invention ever. I've the in laws family group on mute... Every so often I'll open it, 100+ posts.... Straight scroll to the end.... I've a brother in law in the middle east who comes out with the most stupid conspiracy stuff... And another who smokes more green than snoop who's just as bad. Of course, everything they say it's "fact" and we're all blind
Stheno wrote: » Can you mute individuals in a group?
Stheno wrote: » Is that really a thing? My social media footprint is small enough si I usually avoid such craziness
sydthebeat wrote: » Never done it, but according to whatsapp Mute notifications Select an individual or group chat. Press Options > Mute. Select the length of time you'd like to mute notifications for. Press OK. Alternatively, open the individual or group chat. Press Options > View contact or Group info > Mute notifications. Select the length of time you'd like to mute notifications, then press OK.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Google Jim Corr if you want a laugh. He's fully lost it.
Stheno wrote: » I've seen some of his tweets alright on the covid thread, comes across mad as a box of frogs For any of you who find the covid thread bad for your mental health, please dont go into it. On top of the usual "my girlfriends aunts brother in law heard from aliens that this is punishment for climate change" bolloxology, the posters* in there appear to have lost basic skills such as reading comprehension, maths and the ability to google, leading to vast swathes of hysteria, scaremongering and misinformation, which when corrected leads to even more of the same *not all, but a sizeable minority