OOnegative wrote: » https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2058001088/11 A recent one for me, but genuinely a performance I never thought I was capable of until that day.
Murph_D wrote: » Good one B - still can’t believe you had beers the night before, although maybe the relaxed demeanour worked well for you on the day. How good was this compared to your other bests - is it objectively better as well as ‘feeling’ good?
Wubble Wubble wrote: » That's a very good question. There have been a lot of very good ones over 150+ races down the years. I'm going to go for the Docklands 5k of 2017 (Post #323 on my log). Why? I'd had a number of disappointments over the distance, one which I almost unfailingly can't pull out all the stops. This time I got it right, in warm weather conditions (which I hate!) on a Thursday night in July. I had to battle a whole lot of demons along the way, and I needed to really dig in at the end in order to reap the rewards. It was my first sub-20 - still my only one - and as I type, that stat looks like it's going to survive a third year.
healy1835 wrote: » 150+ races, jeepers.....what are we talking, 15 per year or thereabouts? Not outrageous actually , just seemed a lot at first. Must check my own numbers...
Murph_D wrote: » Does anyone use VDOT or other values to get a (somewhat) objective comparison between performances ? There are probably lots of limitations to such a comparison, but my marathon PB VDOT (47.5) is much worse than the 800 (55.9).
Krusty_Clown wrote: » Rotterdam will always stand out on paper as my best performance (2:29:61 ),