pow_pow wrote: » Well the episode with economist Jim Power was fairly terrifying. If your anxiety is not great at the moment, I wouldn't advise listening to it.
humberklog wrote: » Good ding-dong between Giles and Brady today. Like two old folk fighting over the remote control in a nursing home.
Beau wrote: » Yeah, very funny. I thought they were messing at first but Giles was clearly very annoyed!
Deleted User wrote: » I live outside Ireland but have found myself listening to The Stand in recent weeks to stay connected with Irish commentary around the election and other topics. Honestly, I find it woeful at times. Contrast Dunphy's persistent speech disfluency and average intellect with someone like Sam Harris and it becomes painful. The podcast with Dan O'Brien epitomized this. Dan was eager to mark his circle of competence several times: "I don't have the expertise." Dunphy didn't seem to get this. It was embarrassing.
generalgerry wrote: » yeah but what about Franno, the only former sportsman with the distinction of being journalist of the year. so much of a big deal that he makes Dunphy read it out at the start of every interview
SAM SO NITE wrote: » Eamon doesn't do his research " to my untutored eye" anyway. He loves a leading question also " isn't this the worst thing to happen in irish history is it not"
terrydel wrote: » I'd be a big fan of Giles generally, mainly due to his aversion to bull**** and nerdy nonsense thats everywhere in football now, but he was like a 4 year old in this podcast. Whats wrong with someone questioning your opinion in a show that is all about opinions on a set topic. He seemed very stressed!
Dots1982 wrote: » He likes to fight trump’s fake news with his own fake news. Saying twice that Trump’s contention of 2 million dying if the US didn’t introduce restrictions was a figure taken from thin air before Stanage has to correct him.
Chalk McHugh wrote: » Liam Brady was out of order on their team of the year debate in my opinion. Basically telling Giles he was wrong to pick Wan Bisaka over Trent Alexandre. I would have Trent on the team myself but he shouldn't have basically dismissed Johns own opinion. We all see it differently and Giles was right to defend himself. Things settled down towards the end but it was a bit frosty no doubt with Dunphy stirring it up also. I listen to the football and crime shows but will never agree that Dunphy is a good host. He has a terrible habit of butting in mid sentence just as someone is talking and trying to make a point. Its just poor manners.
DeanAustin wrote: » Giles was out of order. It was a bit of fun and he behaved like a child. Took himself way too seriously.
Chalk McHugh wrote: » Ha see what i mean. We all see it differently. Even we cant agree on them not agreeing. To be fair though Brady can be stubborn and Giles hates being questioned. I got a laugh out of it.
Dots1982 wrote: » Giles was too sensitive. He wasn’t able to back up his point and got angry about it. In the end they couldn’t debate at all anymore positions because it was too tense. That no one picked Vardy and two picked firmino was my major bugbear
DeanAustin wrote: » Me too. Thought Dunphy could have stirred it more. There was one podcast last season he was baiting Giles on having Guardiola posters and pyjamas and Giles started losing it. That sort of stuff is what Dunphy is great at. He was trying to take the heat out of the situation with Giles and Brady this week.
Still Ill wrote: » I like Giles, but he has no sense of humour whatsoever.. He has these strange dislikes for TAA and KDB too. There's no chance either of them shouldn't be in a team of the season. Dunno how he's still sticking with his KDB agenda because he's been phenomenal since Giles first criticised him. Eamon picking Milner and Firmino were both laughable also. Overall great pod though and this is why I love the lads :pac: