Runaways wrote: » ‘Sinn Fein haven’t a clue and wouldn’t have a notion how to run a government’ What you’re actually saying is ‘We’re afraid they might actually fix the countless crisis FFG have created and ignored and left behind and we can’t have that happening’ In a nutshell
Mortelaro wrote: » Would ya g'wan out of that I suggest you get your glands checked as they're really gone into claptrap overdrive this past few weeksNoone suggested pharma couldn't switch Your health spokeswoman on the other hand,for(like you) want of something to complain about,is going on like it's a click your fingers job and it happens
Also, does she realise how bespoke these facilities are? The regulatory requirements required to start production, the equipment, training etc. She hasn’t a feckin clue. Is she seriously meant to be SF’s spokesperson on health??
Runaways wrote: » Wish we had more of this. Great to see a journalist from outside the bubble actually tell it like it is. We have little more than mouthpieces here currently. Repeating what they’re told rather than asking hard questions. All too cosy and close to each other and the parties
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » Not covering any blushes - I work in a small part of the sector so I know what is capable of, and, equally, what problems can be created by rushing to production and/or facilities moving to produce items they are not familiar with - look at the problems the UK and US are having with contaminated kits and faulty reagents - not only are those kits useless, the time/resources taken to produce them has been wasted and they've damaged confidence in testing. The whole system needs to be synchronised properly or you are wasting resources and wasting time. And the story you linked mentions only one reagent - there are usually 3/4 different reagents in each kit - and as I said, you can have all the reagents you want, but they are only one part of the testing kits, and examining testing kits requires people, equipment and lab space. If SF have a solution to synchronising production of a multi-component kit, with the testing and analysis regime maybe they could share it with us?
Shefwedfan wrote: » ignorance /ˈɪɡn(ə)r(ə)ns/noun noun: ignorance lack of knowledge or information. Best description for you on a number of subject. No need to post, you just keep showing your ignorance with each post. You should learn sometimes it is better just to keep quiet.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What? Here is just one post from earlier saying just that: Keep digging lads and lassies, the laugh is truly on you today. Undermined again. Sean O'Rourke discussing this now and reps of Irish Pharma companies due on to talk about 'switiching' to making reagaent. So embarrassed for a few posters here again. (well, I'm not actually, just laughing at them getting caught out 'mouthing off' on behalf of FG)
Mortelaro wrote: » Post you quoted,doesnt say what you say it says It just states that the processes are bespoke ie backing up the point that finger clicking changes dont happen It takes time Your inexperienced (in pharma) health spokesperson like yourself meanwhile just scraping that FG hste barrel looking for so.ething to complain about Would you like a shovel?
Shefwedfan wrote: » ignorance /ˈɪɡn(ə)r(ə)ns/noun noun: ignorance lack of knowledge or information. Best description for you on a number of subject.No need to post, you just keep showing your ignorance with each post. You should learn sometimes it is better just to keep quiet.
FrancieBrady wrote: » invective
Shefwedfan wrote: » You will go in circles to be honest with taht poster, every post is a goalpost change.....then when that doesnt work, 1. the caps lock key will come on2. will call you stupid or something 3. Will then accuse you of not answering his/her questions Best to sit back and laugh.....
Shefwedfan wrote: » This just confirms your ignorance on the subject
Shefwedfan wrote: » You will go in circles to be honest with taht poster, every post is a goalpost change.....then when that doesnt work, 1. the caps lock key will come on 2. will call you stupid or something 3. Will then accuse you of not answering his/her questions Best to sit back and laugh.....
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » Maybe pick one of the crises you mention and explain how SF fix it?
tikkahunter wrote: » See Louise OReilly mouthing off on the news about Pharma plants having to step up to the plate .She is a lousy piece of ****e , the majority of pharma plants are already 24/7 365 and are struggling to keep up with batches . Not a word about the employees that have to go in and work in the plants risking bringing the virus home to their family if they become infected at work . Not all of us can stay at home and get paid for it .
FrancieBrady wrote: » Not what the issue was at all Sultan and i don't know if you are being genuine or trying to cover blushes tbh. The issue was...'could pharma companies step up - Yes they can, by their OWN admission. And could pharma switch production - and the answer to that again - is clearly, that they can. The nuances and logistics of the above wasn't the point. Of course there will be challenges to 'step up to'.
Runaways wrote: » By actually acknowledging they exist would be a start. Something FFG haven’t done. At all. Housing crisis alone was an open goal for FF to kill FG with in the election. They didn’t bring it up at all. I wonder why.
joeguevara wrote: » Can I ask you a question? Have you read this article https://www.irishtimes.com/business/commercial-property/while-public-is-distracted-by-covid-19-nama-shrugs-off-loan-sale-findings-1.4208238?mode=sample&auth-failed=1&pw-origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishtimes.com%2Fbusiness%2Fcommercial-property%2Fwhile-public-is-distracted-by-covid-19-nama-shrugs-off-loan-sale-findings-1.4208238 The Irish Times article which was published on March 21st a full 6 days before Shane O Briens article in the Irish Central. Why are you saying that media didn’t ask the hard questions when it was clear the Irish Times did and even suggested that the report was published when the public were distracted. And why did it take the Irish Central another 6 days to publish theirs. Why weren’t they all over this? Also, the Irish Central Article directly quoted the Times, Examiner and the Journal to make their points. It’s strange that you give out about mouthpiece journalism and heap praise on an article that is predominantly made up of said mouthpiece journalism.
Mortelaro wrote: » I thought you that word a few weeks back I'm smiling that you've learned it You were a fan yourself of what it means when I showed the word to you after you threw invective after invective at me in the IRA run SF thread But I'm a modest man Granny always told me,self praise is no praise
Come on...before you go with the invective...cost it for us? *deflection or more invective incoming.
Data trumps invective every day of the week FH.
*Nice to get the old invective in there before you go to bed! I have actually outworked you by 2 years, if that matters at all.
Runaways wrote: » I don’t have an IT subscription. And usually their best stuff is behind a paywall.
Runaways wrote: » In the mood to watch a meltdown Pearse Doherty in conversation with David McWilliams I suggest all you FG fanbots watch and Listen if you can. This is what coming. But FG will of course be late to the thought and will claim it was their plan all along. And you’ll complain about it now but no doubt applaud it when it comes https://www.facebook.com/sinnfein/videos/645715949307217/?vh=e&d=n
Sultan_of_Ping wrote: » Of course they can step up -
FrancieBrady wrote: » Ah so it was 'finger clicking' change that was called for now...more lies. The Pharma Industry just embarrassed the whole contingent of you on here by showing that they can indeed 'step up, and change production' if there is enough of a need.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Unbelievable over the top reaction again.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Thank you for being big enough to admit it. That is all I was claiming. The difficulties and logistics I am sure will present challenges and that is not contested by me anywhere here.
markodaly wrote: » You avoided my question, Francie. Care to answer it?
Mortelaro wrote: » Again (Rings psychology dept) Where did anyone say they couldnt or wouldn't or aren't already?
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/ireland-s-pharma-industry-gears-up-to-make-key-ingredient-for-covid-19-testing-1.4218334%3fmode=amp Alot of egg on some faces here after last night.....surely it was obvious us,having a massive pharma sector,that we should use it to our advantages?? Louise oreilly said it...terrible evil,bad and stupid ill-informed idea,it gets go ahead through government....great idea,fantastic (which it is).....levels of hyprocrisy here is mind-boggling