Balagan1 wrote: » http://www.clare.fm/news/coronavirus/parents-urged-talk-children-congregating-shannon-night/ If their parents gave a damn and/or had any control over these children, they wouldn't be congregating in the first place.
ThewhiteJesus wrote: » My folks live in kilkee i love the place, can't wait to get back when this is over, Walk around the bay, up to Burns cove for a swim with the kids, followed by a creamy pint in the central and a few games of pool. Paradise
mrsoundie wrote: » I grew up there and haven't been back in a while, definitely will be visiting during the summer, if we are allowed out.
JCX BXC wrote: » So only 94 people outside Ennis, in the entire county Clare, applied for unemployment benefit in the last month? Jaysus, in that case I've aided over 10% of those applications! Does anyone actually try to comprehend these figures before they're published?
Claw Hammer wrote: » Either the statistic is wrong, or there are enormous numbers of self-employed people with multiple businesses or are farmers or most of the people working as employees were already on the dole.
Cookiemunster wrote: » The new enforcement laws have been signed into law, but haven't been activated by the government, so no they don't have the powers to enforce it.
Berty wrote: » Still cyclists though and I don't see them passing 50 times on the same loop which means they're easily going over the 2kms unless they're only doing 2kms which is pretty unlikely.
JCX BXC wrote: » Well realistically there's a big difference between a mass exodus of limerick people arriving into their mobile and holiday home, and a fella who cycles 3km from their house instead of 2.
Deagol wrote: » They do now! Minister has signed it.
Berty wrote: » Very true but it's more on the mindset of people is what I'm getting at and how the proportion the choice of activity. If the government tells you don't go outside of 2kms for exercise and/or tells you not to travel to the beach or your holiday home and you go and do it anyway it's the mentality that either the rules don't apply to you or they've come up with an argument in their own head about how they're not affecting anybody because of whatever activity they've decided to do.
Deagol wrote: » I've hardly moved outside my house except to go to our local shop. But I do intend to go for a cycle in a loop that will take me up to 10kms from our house. I won't be stopping, talking to, interacting with or otherwise doing anything that could possibly spread a disease I almost certainly don't have nor anything that could result in me getting it. Cycling round within 2kms of my house would be nigh on impossible out in the countryside but besides that I'm using my intelligence to remain within the spirit of the request. Driving to a holiday home and going around in the local community shopping etc is certainly a completely different thing.
mitresize5 wrote: » sweet jesus ... but I'm just going to my mobile home this weekend, we'll be staying in except for a walk on the Dunlikey morning and evening and getting the kids a burn on the beach. Will be using "my intelligence to remain within the spirit of the request" ....
Balagan1 wrote: » Maybe you're overestimating it a wee bit?
Claw Hammer wrote: » Typical. The rules are for everybody else. That is what is causing the whole problem.
Deagol wrote: » Have you a rebuttal to my point or just enjoying sitting up on that high horse? Here's your chance to save the world - I will revisit my plan to go out for a cycle if you can explain how my actions could possibly in any scenario spread this disease. I'm feeling pretty confident you won't be able to - and using the parent / child 'because it's against the rules' doesn't count.