Shefwedfan wrote: » I said f**k all and it aggressive? You seemed to ignore when I pointed out your little buddy was roaring and shouting yesterday.
Please quote my aggressive posts? Thank you
Shefwedfan wrote: » Sorry was it not you that felt the need to use caps lock on all your posts? Plus today when someone else questioned you, you start name-calling? Just because someone doesn't spend 24x7 on boards doesn't mean they have "ran for the hills" as you put it.
Deleted User wrote: » I was pretty sure i replied,but i apoligise for any preceived oversight on my part We've been through this as regards hounding people for links,meltdowns over use of.cap locks (though possibly pair of ye there) and now effing and blinding at people for supplying info you looked for?? If you feel above isnt agressive,you are free to disagree with me,no skin off my nose...but i suspect you will be alone in this though
Shefwedfan wrote: » I said f**k all and it aggressive? You seemed to ignore when I pointed out your little buddy was roaring and shouting yesterday. Please quote my aggressive posts? Thank you
FrancieBrady wrote: » If you don't know the difference in caps for emphasis and caps lock for ranting, then you should be very humble about your depth of knowledge. And you opted not to ask for proof of what I was saying yesterday and 'ran for the hills' when you couldn't deflect anymore and your bull**** was going to be found out. So can you think of anything else to deflect from the ACTUAL DISCUSSION again today?
Shefwedfan wrote: » See below With the advent of the bulletin board system, or BBS, and later the Internet, typing messages in all caps commonly became closely identified with "shouting" or attention-seeking behavior, and may be considered rude. ... For this reason, etiquette generally discourages the use of all caps when posting messages online
Shefwedfan wrote: » I pulled you up on one post, since then you seem to think it is ok to fire all sorts of comments/accusations at me. I personally would classify that as hounding, would you not?
As I already posted, I did not eff and blind at someone. Saying f**k all if not effing and blinding.
As I have asked you numerous times, please quote my aggressive or meltdown or what you want to call them posts? thank you
[Deleted User] wrote: » Your free to classify it as that if you feel so....your wrong like,but work.away I assume your taking the piss here tbh I see little point in continueing over and back with this,we clearly disagree with what constitutes agressive behaviour?? Now you are free to carryon with what you preumbably think is carefree,relaxed style of posting that involves hounding others and cursing....il retain my view,as likewise you are free to retain yours
tikkahunter wrote: » See Louise OReilly mouthing off on the news about Pharma plants having to step up to the plate .She is a lousy piece of ****e , the majority of pharma plants are already 24/7 365 and are struggling to keep up with batches . Not a word about the employees that have to go in and work in the plants risking bringing the virus home to their family if they become infected at work . Not all of us can stay at home and get paid for it .
all about the mane wrote: » What does she mean by stepping up to the plate?
tikkahunter wrote: » Produce more - even though that is actually impossible for most plants as they are already flat out . But to use their favourite word / it’s spin by her . Imagine that imbecile being in charge of health now .
FrancieBrady wrote: » Can you show us the production data you have that led you to that view?
tikkahunter wrote: » I work in a pharma plant in a role that’s 24/7 365 , to try and fit extra batches in would be impossible. Any body who is in the same boat as me will back that up .
all about the mane wrote: » She obviously hasn’t a clue how pharma plants work. There’s a surprise. At least we know they won’t pay the slightest bit of attention to her. Muppet
all about the mane wrote: » Show us the production data.... I’m sure there employer would only be delighted with sharing such sensitive information on an internet discussion board.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Fair enough...but do you have any data on this? The reason I ask is that a couple of days ago I raised the issue of testing difficulties and various people lost their marbles about scaremongering, lies...the people 'didn't exist', they were 'idiots' and yet today, Leo and the HSE both apologised over those issues which will contib=nue for at least another week. So forgive if I doubt you and ask for data to back up what you said.
tikkahunter wrote: » That information is highly confidential
aido79 wrote: » How did Louise get access to it?
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you are saying they cannot 'step up' production?
tikkahunter wrote: » She didn’t, she doesn’t have a ****ing clue what she is talking about . In a lot of cases companies would have to contract out the work to smaller companies to up batches.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c6e76a2e0d85c3808d93c2f75a0c528d.svg)
