Loughc wrote: » What’s the longest running wrestling storyline can anyone remember seeing? Jerry Lawler and his hatred for Bret, stu and Helen hart. And Bret and Owen fued are two that come to mind.
Wuff Wuff wrote: » Baron Corbin and Roman Reigns
leggo wrote: » We also don’t know the true effects of CTE in people’s day to day lives because they’re not going to let us see them. You say that about Foley, and I hope and would love if it was the case, but then go back and watch some of his last GM run with him basically reading off his hand and messing up every second line (to the point they had to make that the storyline). NFL fans who’ve followed it post-CTE being discovered know how scary it can be. There’s the player who killed himself in the Kansas City Chiefs’ training facility, the ex-player who shot himself in the chest so his brain could be studied, and so many other horror stories. But they’re playing out behind closed doors and we only seem to learn of them when they reach their tragic end. Benoit is a great example we can all relate to: think of how shocked you were when you heard what had happened after years of all us ever hearing about his personal life being how much he doted on his family. We don’t have a clue really when it comes down to it.
J. Marston wrote: » Mike Adamle has it too and is now suffering from dementia. Makes things like "Jeff Harvey" a little sadder with hindsight.
Omackeral wrote: » They took that bit out of Bothchamania's intro because of that which was decent.
Sirsok wrote: » Would wrestling benefit from their titles being defended every few months like boxing and UFC. I was watching a show recently and nearly every match was a title match , none of them meant anything at all and that extends to world titles. Including NXT there's 14 titles up for grabs all defended lost and won every month, making none of them matter. So say cut it down to one world title for men's and womens. 3 brand exclusive titles so smackdown gets cruiserweight and intercontinental raw gets 24/7 and US each gets a tag team title. Would allow for proper storytelling, storylines for female talent that doesn't involve the title. Elevate the prestige of all titles and allow for different main events,which may create new stars. Titles are props right now, I mean they were always technically props but atleast they meant something.
kksaints wrote: » I used to think this viewpoint might work until Brock Lesnar's title reign a few years ago when not having title matches at PPVs made a lot of the main events a complete waste of time and didn't really bring back prestige to the title at all. There is something to be said for longer title reigns but I think you need matches for belts at every PPV at least.
Hammer of the Clods wrote: » I'm not a fan of Becky Lynch's promos. Clearly I'm in a tiny minority, and I do think she's a brilliant pro wrestler, I just never buy her promos.
CastorTroy wrote: » It's mad that she's been Raw champion for nearly a year. Was thinking today listening to Heyman, who has defended the title the most in a single reign in the past 20 years? Like we hear about ones being the longest reigning champion but they may have only had a handful of title matches in that time. And I wouldn't count the hardcore or 24/7 title
briany wrote: » I've often wondered - given Paul Bearer was actually a licensed mortician, do you think any families of a deceased wrestling fan ever asked him to perform his duties in character? Similarly for the Undertaker, I wonder if anybody has ever offered him a big payday just to show up to a funeral in the gear, say a short eulogy and drive the hearse to the graveyard or something?