FrancieBrady wrote: » Which parties have the most millionaires again?
NovemberWren wrote: » and there you are; - it's all about money.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So typically...take the WHOLE world as a sample here: why would a political party want to control the drugs trade in a city, as you said they had done? Look at what the 'drug trade' is ultimately about. What precisely is 'in it for themselves'.
declanflynn wrote: » which party has the most members sponging off the state
NovemberWren wrote: » arranging contract jobs for voters; so that those voters get the housing. people out; shinners in.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What level are we talking here? Jobs for the boys/girls?
declanflynn wrote: » I will rephrase the question, which party has the most members who dont work and are on social welfare?
FrancieBrady wrote: » In numbers...probably SF, as a ratio...probably PBP.
declanflynn wrote: » That explains why members of fg and ff are better off, they wait for it, WORK, maybe those sf and pbp people should try it, instead of crying about lack of this and lack of that
FrancieBrady wrote: » I have never claimed a cent of welfare in my life...and have worked. I'm not a millionaire...what did I do wrong?
declanflynn wrote: » change your stockbroker
FrancieBrady wrote: » Just to clarify earlier discussion...health official at the briefing was asked directly about closures of Parc Ui aoimh and Croke Park and other centres and he said , . Yes there were issues with kits but they were working on that and all centres would be coming back on line.
blanch152 wrote: » Those who best meet the criteria are getting tested. Personally know of three people in different circumstances who were tested today, all of them meet the criteria, now they hadn’t been to Scandinavia or thought they had a bit of a cold, they were showing real symptoms.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Both of them, on medical examination, required tests. So let me get this right...any questioning of the 'official story' is not allowed, because that would be 'Chicken Lickening'? Is that the deal here?
Bass Reeves wrote: » There is no official story, the HSE staff are prioritizing and have to make medical decisions on the availability of equipment whether it's PPE or test kits.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Several times at the presser this evening there were questions about the testing, hightlighting issues that were raised on this thread...vague answers from the Medical experts. I think, as I said earlier, that we will hear more and more of this. This isn't an Irish Water or Swingate scenario, if they feck this up then a lot of people will die un-neccesarily.
Mortelaro wrote: » The other day you were saying vradakar using said experts opinions on what to do was scare mongering because numbers were low Now you're suggesting they're fecking it up Which is it ? in your race for venom Meanwhile
blanch152 wrote: » If they test everyone who was on a plane from Scandinavia and everyone who thinks they are entitled to a test because symptoms, rather than going on medical advice, they will waste a lot of time, money and resources testing the wrong people and fail to flatten the curve. No country is testing every idiot who wants a test or who believes they are sick, so why should we?
FrancieBrady wrote: » And again..issues with testing confirmed on Claire Byrne. So nobody was bull****ting or telling fibs. Those hand waving away issues looking a bit silly. These aren't big issues, but they shouldn't be brushed under any carpet to save blushes.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Simon Coveney rubbished what you are trying to do when a medical expert put it to him that they were issues with testing, he said there was and they were trying to get them fixed. What was brought up this morning is exactly the type of problems that are being reported. 'Every idiot'...jesus, into the gutter you go again. Too late though, Coveney has contradicted you.
blanch152 wrote: » Is that the bit where Coveney said that we were testing 5,000 per day which is higher per capita than most countries in the world? You can get that quote on the RTÉ website. Keep up the scaremongering.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Jesus lads do yous ever just give it a break. Surely it's not good for mental health. Zzzzzzzzz
FrancieBrady wrote: » The BIT where Coveney said that they were ISSUES with testing which the lady spoke about. What is wrong with you, are you going to dig a deeper hole and start castigating those who are waiting on tests and tests results? The nephew I mentioned had doctors appointments for his and the family friend had hers done through a doctor at a test centre and is still waiting on a result. All confirmed to be issues. Stop digging and protecting.
blanch152 wrote: » My nephew contacted his GP this morning and was tested this afternoon. Why? Because his symptoms and underlying conditions pushed him right to the top of the queue, ditto a woman I know in a nursing home, decision to request test yesterday, tested today. Medical need is driving decisions about who gets testing, and who gets results quickly, which is how it should be, one of the three people who I know got tested today is already on oxygen having only gone to hospital yesterday feeling unwell.