Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Well for starters watch the video that rossie1977 posted just a few posts above.
rossie1977 wrote: » Because Fox News are claiming it hourly and its watchers are parotting it back
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Oh come on. 'Claiming' it?? You're speaking as it there's no substance to it. There without doubt is. And at this stage, nope, not just Fox News ...
notobtuse wrote: » Can't watch videos where I'm at. Please explain it to me.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Soooooo You cant watch videos where you are but you can post them? How do you know what you are posting?
notobtuse wrote: » How so? Or is it just hyperbole on you part?
notobtuse wrote: » Yes, I can watch them on the my phone. I can post a link from this pc, but the videos are blocked on this computer from viewing.
alchemist33 wrote: » Not at all. Note all the decisions he's taken during the presidency that benefit himself and the rich, his performances in front of the cameras, and his personal history.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Ok, watch it on your phone and then get back to me. I would describe it to you but words fail me.
notobtuse wrote: » Words fail you? That's a first! Perhaps Thursday after I watch it Wednesday evening. I work 15 hour days Monday and Tuesday.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » I do 12/15 hours monday - friday, it's a 90 second clip.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Has he announced if he is doing a presser tonight?
notobtuse wrote: » I guess someone forgot to inform you but EVERYONE has benefited from his decisions. And there is saying that holds true... believe more what someone does rather than what they say. And he is doing some very fine stuff for the citizens of the US.
notobtuse wrote: » So you make decisions regarding someone based on a 90 second clip. Wellllll.... that explains a lot.
6 wrote: » I thought Biden had issues with the lapses etc, but I heard a lot of it is down to a bad stutter he had as a child.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Ouch, Acosta never learns ..https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1244775668031913985 Funny how MSM never asked Obama at a presser in 2010 did he regret saying the previous year that the first cases of Swine Flu were "not a cause for alarm" given that within a year close to 13,000 had died from it. Instead they had his back, as they should, given the situation, and respected that it's a tough position to be in. If only they could respect that the current POTUS was, and is, also in that tough position, rather than nit pick over every syllable he says in the hope that they can get something on him which will be of benefit to them come November. One would think a health crisis such as the one we're in would have these hack activists who masquerade as journalists parking their Get Trump agenda for five minutes, for the sake of their country if nothing else.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » . By the way, note how Obama says at the beginning (the date was April 27th, 2009 I believe) that while the emerging cases of Swine flu were concerning they were "not a cause for alarm". Well, 12 months later over 12,500 people were dead from it.
notobtuse wrote: » If one looks for a silver lining in all this COVID119 mess... it’s that the Green New Deal pushed by Democrats is now pretty much dead in the water. The Coronavirus has given Americans a small glimpse of the long term pain a Green New Deal would inflict on our country. Less funds, capitalism crushed, large sectors of the domestic economy shuttered, limited travel, inability to find food or supplies, emergency protocols, and on and on. Things would probably be 10 times worse if the Green New Deal were forcibly applied. No one here with half a brain will be signing up for a lifetime of this diminished standard of living nonsense to possibly prevent some consequences to people in Vietnam 100 years from now. Joe Biden better reevaluate his support for it or voters will be storming his campaign headquarters with pitchforks and torches. Good riddance Green New Deal!
amdublin wrote: » Ps. Notobtuse, you are very good at this Propaganda and Diversion thing. Good job you!
I know South Korea better than anybody. you know how many people are in Seoul? Do you know how big the city of Seoul is? 38 million people. That's bigger than anything we have.
Billy Mays wrote: » Hey notobtue, did you see this whopper from your clowncar in chief last night? Actual population of Seoul: 9 million people