FrancieBrady wrote: » I would dispute that actually. It is a very simple task in many ways as everything else is on somewhat of a back burner. FG have done well to hand over to the experts who are performing one of the most radical 'fixes' to our health system ever seen...including doing some things FG themselves have been stridently saying could never be done. Will it be enough to fix what almost every FF FG member and supporter in this country thought was a problem too big to fix, remains to be seen.
TheCitizen wrote: » :pac: SF aren't losing anything just because a few FG fanboys on Boards.ie are starting threads to bitch about them. The bitching about SF from FFG and their MSM media dogs like Pat Kenny and Miriam O'Callaghan if anything translated in to a growing of support for SF, it seems they never learn.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I also think FG are handling this well, for the record. But I also sincerely hope there's a reckoning after all this is over, with why measures such as a rent freeze are considered acceptable to deal with one crisis (COVID-19) and not another crisis (a whole generation being f*cked over by high rents and seeing their lives slipping away). People shouldn't forget how quickly measures which were "impossible" a few weeks ago were introduced when a crisis appeared that had the potential to disrupt the lives of everyone, as opposed to one from which the establishment class are shielded.
blanch152 wrote: » What a ridiculous point to make. This three-month rent freeze together with the other short-term measures is going to result in all of us paying a lot more taxes for two or three years and probably also see the frontline healthcare workers do without pay increases for the same time, and you think we can do it every week? That is before I comment on how you compare people dying from Covid-19 to milleniums that can't afford an apartment near their mammy as being similar crises.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » This supposed working class party are leading the charge to put 150,000 construction workers on the dole
all about the mane wrote: » SF’s base are the unemployed. They couldn’t care less about those actually working.
Ballso wrote: » You're right there, I would never vote SF now, despite giving them some preferences in the past. Populist vermin trading on fear and ignorance, I hope they get eviscerated in the next election.
Praetorian wrote: » I'd say if FG could orchestrate another election after the "emergency" has finished, I think they would do quite well. Honestly I think they are doing a very good job considering the circumstances.
TheCitizen wrote: » SF got 24.5% of the vote, more than any other party. It's not just unemployed people that vote SF but I'm sure they won't mind if your party continues to abandon the unemployed and give up on even trying to get their votes.
TheCitizen wrote: » It's not just SF that are questioning the conditions for workers on building sites, the unions are as well but you're not interested in that. The CIF which represents building employers they're calling for sites to remain open, you'd typically be on their side as opposed to the regular workers on the sites.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » But I also sincerely hope there's a reckoning after all this is over
TheCitizen wrote: » Oh go ahead, go right ahead.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Anyone in the industry including workers I talk to want to see sites left open Sinn Fein unions etc will reap what they sow
smurgen wrote: » Is that why construction worker workers in Australia Canada and the US are striking now to be left go home? Is SF driving that in these countries too?
Runaways wrote: » Theyve been all over the radio tv and papers the past two weeks. I get people can’t tune into everything but they’ve been far more visible than at any point I can ever remember. And they’ve not made mention of their get rid of the border objective once. Bizarre take Barry
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » There'll be no getting away with SF magic promises of 100k free gaffes. The economy will have to be rebuilt again just like after 2008. Who will the pubic trust to do that? The party that had the record of doing so Vs a party that could not be bothered trying to govern in the North for three years.
[Deleted User] wrote: » be interesting alright but I'm not convinced people are voting rationally when they vote for SF. No one could look at the cluster-**** that has been the NI health system, economy or Assembly and think SF are any good at governance.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » Free gaff free everything brigade mostly. Cohorts who have the same mindset through all age groups.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » Strangely now we never hear about the mythical FFG party that SF voters were saying that they were the alternative to. FFG, two cheeks of the same arse I heard more often than not, got twice as many seats.
storker wrote: » Let them be honest with the electorate and stand as single party, and see how many votes they get.
Suckit wrote: » Strangely now we have a global pandemic and we don't hear a lot of things we were hearing a few months ago.
The One Doctor wrote: » FG will be returned in a landslide next election. It'll be like SF never had their victory.
Auguste Comte wrote: I highly doubt that. When people see how FG ran down the health service leaving us with the worst health service in Europe while we face into biggest health care crisis in generations they will reassess their priorities.