hatrickpatrick wrote: » But I also sincerely hope there's a reckoning after all this is over
TheCitizen wrote: » SF got 24.5% of the vote, more than any other party. It's not just unemployed people that vote SF but I'm sure they won't mind if your party continues to abandon the unemployed and give up on even trying to get their votes.
TheCitizen wrote: » It's not just SF that are questioning the conditions for workers on building sites, the unions are as well but you're not interested in that. The CIF which represents building employers they're calling for sites to remain open, you'd typically be on their side as opposed to the regular workers on the sites.
Praetorian wrote: » I'd say if FG could orchestrate another election after the "emergency" has finished, I think they would do quite well. Honestly I think they are doing a very good job considering the circumstances.
Ballso wrote: » You're right there, I would never vote SF now, despite giving them some preferences in the past. Populist vermin trading on fear and ignorance, I hope they get eviscerated in the next election.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » This supposed working class party are leading the charge to put 150,000 construction workers on the dole
all about the mane wrote: » SF’s base are the unemployed. They couldn’t care less about those actually working.
blanch152 wrote: » What a ridiculous point to make. This three-month rent freeze together with the other short-term measures is going to result in all of us paying a lot more taxes for two or three years and probably also see the frontline healthcare workers do without pay increases for the same time, and you think we can do it every week? That is before I comment on how you compare people dying from Covid-19 to milleniums that can't afford an apartment near their mammy as being similar crises.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I also think FG are handling this well, for the record. But I also sincerely hope there's a reckoning after all this is over, with why measures such as a rent freeze are considered acceptable to deal with one crisis (COVID-19) and not another crisis (a whole generation being f*cked over by high rents and seeing their lives slipping away). People shouldn't forget how quickly measures which were "impossible" a few weeks ago were introduced when a crisis appeared that had the potential to disrupt the lives of everyone, as opposed to one from which the establishment class are shielded.
TheCitizen wrote: » :pac: SF aren't losing anything just because a few FG fanboys on Boards.ie are starting threads to bitch about them. The bitching about SF from FFG and their MSM media dogs like Pat Kenny and Miriam O'Callaghan if anything translated in to a growing of support for SF, it seems they never learn.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I would dispute that actually. It is a very simple task in many ways as everything else is on somewhat of a back burner. FG have done well to hand over to the experts who are performing one of the most radical 'fixes' to our health system ever seen...including doing some things FG themselves have been stridently saying could never be done. Will it be enough to fix what almost every FF FG member and supporter in this country thought was a problem too big to fix, remains to be seen.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I would dispute that actually.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » From what I have seen, there is more SF ‘bots’ on here than all other party supporters combined.
Ballso wrote: » Running a caretaker government in the middle of a global pandemic is extremely difficult. .
Runaways wrote: » there are pictures of Maria Bailey on a swing doing the rounds. ‘for the lolz’ Jaysis
Ballso wrote: » Of course McDonald should self isolate if she is unwell, christ
all about the mane wrote: » How long will she self isolate this time? Now that was embarrassing
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Staying home to look after her family during a frightening time for them? Embarrassing indeed I suppose, from the point of view of the FG types who don't understand concepts such as compassion.
TheCitizen wrote: » You mean people like eFFing Blueshirt fanboys like you :pac:. sure you'd never vote SF anyway. SF are not being irresponsible in this crisis at all, the opposite in fact. People will remember how bitter eFFing Blueshirts like you were and still are after the last election result and they will desert you even further if you can't grow up and respond to the changing demands of the Irish electorate. FFG Jobs for the boys and crony capitalism ain't going to cut it anymore.
Field east wrote: » Mary Lou got an opportunity to clarify how the Gov could use the circa 11bninthe escrow account re Apple and 100% yet again failed to do so. She threw out a few comments such as ‘we have to do extradionary things in extradinory Times’ and ‘ the Irish gov should not have challenged the decision by the EU’ suggesting that if it did not then it would have all that money to spend.
Ballso wrote: » We have political parties who are serious in opposition. SF do not fit that description - overly simplistic garbage like talking about 'de apple money' in the middle of a crisis is irresponsible in the extreme. Running a government is extremely complex, there aren't simple solutions for everything and everything is a balancing act. Running a caretaker government in the middle of a global pandemic is extremely difficult. SF aren't the only ones whe do the populist schtick nonsense but people are utterly sick of it. People will remember.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If we are going to attach a seriousness and duty to 'government', then there has to be a seriousness and duty to opposition. You have to be brave enough to speak up if you see a failure or a lapse...even at the expense of your own popularity.