efanton wrote: » Serious question. So please serious answers, its not meant as a springboard for yet more point scoring from either side. In the event that no government can be formed by Sunday, does the president have any special powers to enact law?
Runaways wrote: » You didn’t watch the press conference. Clearly. The man is physically incapable of not putting his foot in it and up his own hole. Though at this stage and current crisis I think it’s very much by design
blanch152 wrote: » You didn’t link the press conference. You linked a prominent influencer who effectively said that Leo made her proud of Ireland again, and without any evidence, suggested this meant he had put his foot in it and was a Tory. I am baffled at what you are trying to say. It just doesn’t make sense, if you explain it I might understand.
joeguevara wrote: » It’s truly strange. But if you ask what they are talking about you get called an infectious bot.
joeguevara wrote: » Trust me I’m not a bot. I asked a question of you. You didn’t answer. Only replied asking me did I understand what inverted commas meant. You didn’t answer what a tweet by Claire Kelly had to do with the tories. You didn’t answer sweet fcuck all to tell you the truth. Are you a bot or just an annoying pr1ck?
Rodney Bathgate wrote: It is about time the thread title was changed. 6 weeks later and SF have done f**k all. Unsurprisingly.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Again, sf won't be in government anytime soon, they simply won't be able to as ffg will do everything in their power to prevent this from happening, possibly indefinitely. The numbers don't stack up for sf anyway
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » The numbers are there to form a coalition without FF and FG. If only SF weren’t toxic to so many other parties.
Rodney Bathgate wrote: The numbers are there to form a coalition without FF and FG. If only SF weren’t toxic to so many other parties.
Runaways wrote: » Answering questions with questions and if don’t understand’ seems to be the new play. If you don’t understand lads and aren’t willing to listen there’s no point in debate. But I’m sure that actually the objective eh
Runaways wrote: They actually said it. ‘Strong and stable.’
Runaways wrote: » They actually said it. ‘Strong and stable.’ Oh god. It’s embarrassing and worrying they’re so deaf dumb and blindhttps://twitter.com/seandefoe/status/1242895973661245443?s=21
Mary Lou wrote: I want to see a good, stable, strong government that can deliver on housing, on health, can deliver on the issues that matter to people. But if there is an election, I mean we’ll go and we’ll fight the election
Rodney Bathgate wrote: » Did you object when Mary Lou said the same?
Wanderer78 wrote: » The numbers really aren't there at all, it would be simply too complicated to form a government with sf, not just because of their toxic element, of which I do agree with, but because of also the power play that already exists with both ffg, ffg will continue to block alternatives from forming, this may remain in Irish politics indefinitely
Shefwedfan wrote: » You made a mistake, just admit it and move on!!! it getting embarrassing now
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » And they can't even form a government because the left is so fractured. Does she realise how ridiculous she sounds?
Runaways wrote: » You’re playing a blinder keep going Your inability to answer questions or understand them needs work though.
Shefwedfan wrote: » You didn't ask me a question. You posted a tweet and couldn't even read it :p:p:p then instead of admitting the mistake you attack a poster. Your standard idoitic response "ahhhh ddddaaaa aaahhhhh your a bot" :P Your as bad as the other clown that tried to say cars are commericals
Runaways wrote: » You clearly have comprehension issues.
Jinglejangle69 wrote: » So why are SF ranting saying the people have a mandate for change yet SF can't even form a government yet FF and FG can??
