GreeBo wrote: » The house spec is continually rising though, there are far more materials going into houses today than there were 15 years ago.
GreeBo wrote: » Is that a fall in supply or demand though?
Interested Observer wrote: » They go hand-in-hand to some extent surely. If a homeowner decides not to move (reducing demand) their own property won't go on the market either (reducing supply). Builders went bust reducing supply, hundreds of thousands lost their jobs reducing demand. Or else it could have been external factors like being much harder to get a mortgage.
voluntary wrote: » The cost of construction is rapidly falling. Check the raw material prices, they're falling as well as fuel. This will soon translate to cheaper building materials. High unemployment releases a lot of man power into the labour market, labour cost is going down. The speculative land prices is going down too, similarly to other assets, investors run away to cash (US Dollars).
Graham wrote: » I do admire your absolute certainty that there is a 'correct' value for property and that market value is somehow incorrect.
lomb wrote: » That isn't worth more than 550-600k. I've no idea the mindset of the lunatic that buys this house. Even if you have the money why would anyone wealthy want to live there? Alot of South Dublin property is overbought and alot of other property isn't.
cnocbui wrote: » Houses have an underlying basic cost of construction. If the market considers a house to be worth less than it costs to build, no one will build them.
The Belly wrote: » Well from the table below there is a fair fall in lending during a recession if the last one was anything to go by. Source Central Bank Loan approvals - All Agencies - by year Year New Houses Other Houses Totals Number Value €m Number Value €m Number Value €m 2000 33,289 3726.2 47,567 5277.4 80,856 9003.7 2001 29,277 3695.9 39,785 5036.6 69,062 8732.6 2002 39,399 5985.9 53,737 8373.4 93,136 14359.3 2003 39,676 6968.2 58,212 10477.8 97,888 17446.1 2004 50,018 9750 54,287 11269.2 104,305 21019.2 2005 58,104 12971 61,933 14782.3 120,037 27753.3 2006 53,895 13994.7 60,698 17387.5 114,593 31382.2 2007 40,497 10560.4 48,250 13503.7 88,747 24064.1 2008 26,293 6625.2 29,586 8515 55,879 15140.3 2009 12,584 2719.7 15,340 3711.4 27,924 6431.1 2010 6,991 1,354.60 13,030 2,799.20 20,021 4,153.90 2011 2,960 541.2 9,874 1886.4 12,834 2427.7 2012 3,457 599.5 14,312 2625.5 17,769 3225 2013 2,974 530.6 16,284 3178.6 19,258 3709.3 2014 4,461 869.7 27,436 5317.4 31,897 6187.2 2015 4,685 996.5 27,551 5329.4 32,236 6326 2016 6,450 1517.1 28,587 5767.7 35,037 7284.8 Notes: Source: From lending institutions and local authorities
SozBbz wrote: » Completely agree - who's to say what the correct price is? A house is worth what a person is willing to pay for it, end of story.
voluntary wrote: » If you're hunting for a home right now I think there may be some good opportunities in former airbnb market very soon. Some will be trying to enter the regular rental market, but I'm near certain many will exit the investments at this stage, especially when the rental market is at standstill and even asking lower rents may not currently secure tenants.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » You’re completely right, but the answer to your last question remains “no house”. Do not consign yourself to a decade or more of negative equity. Stay mobile. Stay flexible. Stay liquid.
Assetbacked wrote: » For example, calling it a drop rather than a correction indicates their view on the price decreases.
Augeo wrote: » ........... I bought my first property in 2005, I very much gave a sh1t what happened to property prices over the following decade.
Interested Observer wrote: » Or, I can buy the house that myself, my wife and my kids all now live in and just not give a **** what happens to property prices over the next decade.
kevinc565 wrote: » I love it when these unrealistically priced houses fall in price. Still way too expensive though! Down €100k earlier this month.https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/3-whitebeam-avenue-clonskeagh-dublin-14-d14a3t7/4406210
landofthetree wrote: » In 3-4 weeks time everybody will see how bad things are. Anybody thinking we aren't facing a huge downturn is in for a shock.
awec wrote: » If they are on the property ladder. Let's be absolutely clear here, because it seems to be getting lost, if some people get bargains it's because many more people have been taken out of the market. That is to say, this notion of "everyone wait, everyone get a bargain" is just not how it works. It's nonsense. The choice for many people is not overpriced house now or cheap house later. It's overpriced house now vs no house later.
LuasSimon wrote: » A third higher rate of tax circa 50% will be needed for central funds for welfare etc
LuasSimon wrote: » The government will have to recoup taxs from somewhere when this is over, increased property tax might balance the books to replace business rates for local councils. A third higher rate of tax circa 50% will be needed for central funds for welfare etc