Jizique wrote: » SF don’t have to pay any rent then; nobody would pay rent if SF got in - isn’t there a 50% evasion of local authority rents in the country already
Plumbthedepths wrote: » 50% evasion, is there any links to back up your claim?
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » It is in DCChttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/first-dublin-city-council-social-housing-tenant-to-be-evicted-for-rent-arrears-1.4085923%3fmode=amp
Shefwedfan wrote: » At least you have given up on m50 Why was I complaining? It’s called explaining, good on them. Trump done the same in US and still doing it now, just watch the video about Corvid 19 and he disregarded it and now it says he knew all along it was serious. People lapping it up, SF the exact same, people lapping it up Just the SF supporters seem to think nobody can stop the BS, unfortunately people can
Why was I complaining? It’s called explaining, good on them
Just the SF supporters seem to think nobody can stop the BS, unfortunately people can
Plumbthedepths wrote: » The poster claimed 50% evasion in local authority housing in the country. Since they haven't replied I can assume they are spouting crap like so many here.
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » 50 percent non payment in any area is too much, I assume you would agree?
all about the mane wrote: » The shinners have never been so triggered. Can’t blame them really. Only those muppets could turn an election result like that into such an own-goal
Plumbthedepths wrote: » The claim was 50% of ALL local authority housing . A bs claim. Btw you do understand the difference between arrears and evasion I hope?.
The lower-income households account for the smallest percentage of the arrears,” Rose Kenny executive manager of the council’s housing department said. “When you take €800-plus as something we would call a high income, and that includes subsidiary earners in a household, they account for over 44 per cent of the outstanding arrears.”
The 25 tenants who have allowed their debts to exceed €27,000 were in this higher-earning bracket, she said.”
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Yes, I understand. Do you think 50 percent non payment is ok?
Plumbthedepths wrote: » The poster i replied to claimed there was 50% evasion in rent throughout LA housing in the country , you are claiming it's 50% in DCC even your link contradicts you. Evasion and Arrears are not the same thing. If either of those words are difficult for you to understand you can Google their meaning.
Wanderer78 wrote: » nonsense, European central banks have the ability to create this money, but they probably wont, resulting in the usual approach of qe and rate reduction
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » If you don't want to answer or some might say evade the question that's fine
efanton wrote: » I think everyone would agree. But FG have had 10 years to do something about it, and how many have been evicted or threatened with with eviction? Yet in Dublin its nor the poorest that dont pay their rent it is those that that earn the most and have council tenancies. Rose Kenny executive manager of the council’s housing department said Here she is talking about €800 a week not a monthhttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/top-earning-city-council-tenants-most-likely-to-default-on-rent-1.4106254
ThunbergsAreGo wrote: » Just to be clear I wasn't poor bashing merely trying to help with a link. Why do council's get away with everything? Why are things always the governments fault?
joeguevara wrote: » Maybe I’m wrong, but I think you have misunderstood this. The article that you have quoted does say the highest earners are the ones in default. But, as far as I can see and maybe I’m incorrect ( as the article is behind a pay wall} it is the top earners who qualify for social housing council tenancy which is 42k a yea joint income. That’s not top earners that you were talking about is it?
efanton wrote: » I'm sure that might have meant something to you, but it makes no grammatical sense whatsoever Given up on the M50? ? What has Trump got to do with anything? What BS cant be stopped?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Yea sure. But did it even dawn on you when 'analysing' SF to have a look/comparison with others?
Shefwedfan wrote: » I see, a Trump supporter :P
NovemberWren wrote: » @ efanton. is it unfair to charge such different amounts for council houses that are exactly the same. If it is a family house and a young adult has a good job (however long that might last) that young adult might be saving for a deposit for their own place. i.e., actual the actual council house itself is the same as the actual other council houses? Or, are these evictions, connected to council houses, where a householder is taking in others (not family members) to live.
Or, are these evictions, connected to council houses, where a householder is taking in others (not family members) to live.
all about the mane wrote: » hook line and sinker! a shinner claiming that anyone else doesn't know about economics
efanton wrote: » You still haven't managed to make you previous post intelligible.
efanton wrote: » MOST commercial traffic is NOT heavy good vehicles, its mostly vans and company reps.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Coming from someone who came up with this nugget thats a compliment :P:P:P:P:P:P P.S you need to buy a new keyboards, the caps lock button is fu*ked on yours
Runaways wrote: » If any of the regular ordinary fine gael (ahaha) voters here can detail any one thing they’ve done that’s beneficial to them in their lives or any ordinary citizen in the past even 3 years I’d love to hear it. Enlighten us oh godlings We all want to hear it. What have they actually done. Swear I won’t bring up them inconvenient 10,000,homeless people due to bank repossessions. I swear. Go for it.
Shefwedfan wrote: » Funny, I have been accused now of FF, Green and now FG supporter All accusations by SF supporters while rolling out tripe and thinking noone would call it out. Or you one of the SF supporters that isnt a supporter but is a supporters on boards
efanton wrote: » And exactly what was wrong with that. A commercial vehicle is any vehicle owned by a company. That could be a HGV, a van a car.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_vehicle Maybe you should buy a dictionary
efanton wrote: » The M50 is designed to carry heavy vehicles, many of the roads in the city were never designed to carry heavy vehicles which is why they are constantly being repaired and resurfaced.
