FrancieBrady wrote: » Of course you aren't. You just want to continue posting lazy generalisations and hate speech. Something you accuse others of doing on Twitter.
Mitch Connor wrote: » They used the emergency broadcast legislation to do it, didn't they?
road_high wrote: » I don’t know. I asked you where it was described as an “emergency broadcast”? It either was or it wasn’t
The broadcast is being made under Section 112 of the Broadcast Act, which allows the Government broadcasting time for announcements in the event of a major emergency.
Runaways wrote: » Of course they are blanch dear. Here thisll keep you going for the foreseeable.https://twitter.com/ivanyatesnt/status/1240202329166622720?s=21
FrancieBrady wrote: » TBH I think what he managed to do was scare a lot of people, using this facility. Their(FG's) tweet and FB machine was informing people for an hour or two before that 'The Taoiseach was going to address the nation at 9pm'. Somebody actually interrupted a work conference I was having online to say 'IT' was happening. It unnecessarily frightened a lot of people in my care as they thought that the crisis had worsened. What we got was a (depending on your sensibilities) a Hollywood style motivational address to the nation. Welcome, if you are into that kind of thing. Not of much use otherwise.
Augeo wrote: » I didn't detect any bile or anything in the post you've quoted. Realistic musings perhaps.
road_high wrote: » Nothing I said about MLM is disputed by actual evidence of course! .
MLM is very much lacking any real energy or hunger to be Taoiseach.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Costa Coffee and the local chipper packed out the door yesterday. I don't think any amount of scaring was unnecessary. Large enough portions of the population continue to not give a sh1t. If any of them copped on it would be great.
road_high wrote: » We’re safe enough there. MLM couldn’t set up a raffle let alone set up and run a government.
Mitch Connor wrote: » https://extra.ie/2020/03/17/news/irish-news/leo-varadkar-to-make-emergency-broadcast-to-nation-at-9pm
Idbatterim wrote: » my local chipper doing delivery only
FrancieBrady wrote: » That facility really should only be used for the most grave of situations. As stated, nothing wrong at all in hearing from the Taoiseach regularly, but there was nothing in what Leo said that couldn't have been stated in a 'special interview' on the news. Do the same thing as SF do if the party wants to get notice out there on social media. People were unnecessarily alarmed at a time when calm is important. e.g.https://twitter.com/sinnfeinireland/status/1239550959791091713/photo/1
FrancieBrady wrote: » It unnecessarily frightened a lot of people in my care as they thought that the crisis had worsened.
Mitch Connor wrote: » I disagree with you completely. there are many people for who calm is not required, and their calmness about the situation is exactly the problem. Its not about getting notice on social media. its about trying to get the people of Ireland onboard for what is going to be a difficult time. That tweet got 7 retweets and 34 likes. FFS. Is that the level you want the government to be going for on Covid-19? We'll all be dead in a week.
Mitch Connor wrote: » Cool. Doesn't change the fact the one i'm talking about was packed out, inside and a queue outside. Along with the local coffee shops and basically any eatery that hasn't closed itself.
road_high wrote: » Never saw it described as such- least not officially- can you link us to where this was described as such?
Runaways wrote: » It was a good speech and a bit of a stunt let’s be honest but the amount of people creaming themselves over it on twitter is something else. And he’s rehired that spin doctor previously let go cos well, bad optics... So can only assume the finerbot team have doubled recruitment and arts working overtime.
efanton wrote: » It really doesn't matter whether is was a good speech or a crap speech. This silly nit picking and political point scoring is stupid. No matter what you politics are we should cut the man a bit of slack. To be be perfectly fair if it was Michael Martin or Mary Lou what would they have said instead? Pretty much the same thing possibly without the superman reference.
FrancieBrady wrote: » If you are 'cutting slack' it is also important to point out that mild criticism/advice is hardly high treason either. The arrogant outrage that anyone might have a criticism of FG on here is funny tbh.
Runaways wrote: » Conversely if Mary lou had given that exact speech word for word she’d be getting castigated here and everywhere.
landofthetree wrote: » Rightly so. She promised no austerity ever again no matter what the circumstances. Leo has said it will cost us economically and take years to pay. Mary Lou can never back any austerity.
Runaways wrote: » McWilliams has thoughts on his pod yesterday. We don’t have to borrow. We can just print money and keep it all afloat. There’s no rules against it. quantitative easing is going to happen in the US so why not here.
FrancieBrady wrote: » TBH I think what he managed to do was scare a lot of people............... It unnecessarily frightened a lot of people..............
FrancieBrady wrote: » That is going to take actual work...not broadcasts that that demographic is not going to pay any attention to anyway.
Runaways wrote: » I mentioned finerbots and boards.ie to emmet Kirwan on twitter the other day. He had some really choice words about them and here