Taylor365 wrote: » I'll wait to dip until we're seeing reports of 100+ dead a day in US. Jesus, what have i become....
peterofthebr wrote: » -also watching oil (big problems with shale companies now) .. -the big one is the existing dept. that was issue without impact of virus..
voluntary wrote: » It's sometimes worth to take a step back and look at the big picture. Having medium strength balls you'd want to wait until at least tech index hits 5400, with strong balls you'd wait even for 3600 before going shopping.
inisfree0504 wrote: » Just curious, what types of things would you be watching out for in the next while?
all about the mane wrote: » What significance do those figures have?
coolshannagh28 wrote: » Long term trendlines towards which the markets will be drawn as the crisis unfolds .
all about the mane wrote: » I just don’t see those trend lines matching up to support and resistance points. They look a bit off to me. Just my opinion.
coolshannagh28 wrote: » Im not sure if they represent moving averages , support and resistance etc but many traders use their own long term trend lines drawn from pivot points Fibonnaci levels and personal trading experience which these most likely represent.
peterofthebr wrote: » so your homework look at companies you like and their history in a recession
all about the mane wrote: » Yeah, I have my own drawn but they are very different to those
OwlsZat wrote: » Do share.
all about the mane wrote: » Can’t do over the phone right now. Will need my laptop. Nothing to say mine are right either. They say tech analysis is nearly as much art as science
Underground wrote: » I'm still not underwater on MSFT shares and I only bought them in August.
Pinsnbushings wrote: » Apologies in advance guys probably the wrong thread, wondering what would be considered a decent return on investment spread betting? Started last week fully in the knowledge I'd be a Millionaire now with the market meltdown alas that's not the case.. Not as easy to hold your nerve when you see the figures flying up and down on the screen..
OwlsZat wrote: » 100% its someway between an art form and guess work. Will be interesting to see an alternative approach.
strathspey wrote: » I'm thinking some of the Nasdaq PC/Server manufactures might be a good pick. The likes of AMD and Intel were already struggling to fill their order books prior to this crash and now with remote working, virtual conferencing, machine learning processing their products will be in even higher demand.
weemcd wrote: » I've been eyeing up AMD for quite some time, only question is when...
voluntary wrote: » Drew some touch points now, red for the top line, green for the bottom. Move the lines up or down a little - doesn't really matter. The marked area over the top line on the right is roughly covered with the period of Trump administration. One interesting point is the 2018 mini-crash. After 2 weeks of heavy selloff the index is still higher than after this mini-crash which happened for no reason. We have good reason now. Another - NASDAQ touched today the 200-day moving average which technically should work as a strong support. this one's quite scary too:
all about the mane wrote: » How do i add a pic?
voluntary wrote: » you can upload it here:https://imgur.com/upload and then use the image address after clicking the "insert image" icon in the new message.
Thargor wrote: » Ah Jaysus you're going to have to give a bit more detail on your position than that if you want advice, whats gone wrong?
