landofthetree wrote: » They cant leave government until the other 125 TDs vote them out. Till then FG have to keep going as the others have ran away. SF will keep away from government. Yeara of austerity ahead.
Deleted User wrote: » Should you not be posting pics of children killed by the UDA and blaming SF :pac:
Deleted User wrote: » Meh...im not one using dead kids to make a political pint...laughing at yous pretending to care tbh mate
FrancieBrady wrote: » So in the absence of a new government they ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE TO DO STUFF.
all about the mane wrote: » Are they doing stuff? Yes. The OP claimed otherwise. This is what the thread is about. The OP was wrong. To be fair, it was a hospital pass of a thread to begin with but fair play to the posters on here still trying to make a game of it
FrancieBrady wrote: » Read slowly here: The OP was in response to FG's assertion that they would go into opposition for the next term (5 years) ..........
FrancieBrady wrote: » Read slowly here: The OP was in response to FG's assertion that they would go into opposition for the next term (5 years) Has the next term begun = No Has your pointscoring any relevance/credence = No
Fr_Dougal wrote: » .
FrancieBrady wrote: » So in the absence of a new government they ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE TO DO STUFF. Point out to us all WHAT other parties can do other than fulfill the duties of opposition and point out lapses and flaws in what the government are doing or not doing.
landofthetree wrote: » The other parties can form a new government. They have 125TDs. Only need 79. They are running away because its austerity for years ahead. New election needed in Sep/Oct.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » How are FF running away? Martin seems to me to be forcing the pace on a deal with FG.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So can FG/FF and the Greens/multiple combinations...what happened with that one?
all about the mane wrote: » The Greens are slow to go in. Can’t blame them.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So nobody can form a new government currently.
IAmTheReign wrote: » They could actually get on with forming a government. I mean they keep going on about what FG are doing wrong and what they would do if they were in charge during this crisis.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » How can they do that? Realistically you need two out of three from FF, FG & SF to form a government, and FF and FG have made it clear they won't do business with SF.
landofthetree wrote: » Wrong. You dont need FF or FG.
Loafing Oaf wrote: » In theory. And in theory it would be possible for SF+FG+whoever to form a government. But neither is a realistic proposition...
landofthetree wrote: » Well I hope people cop on that voting for indos in large numbers leads to this sort of mess.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Voting for a party that decided first to huff, then play games hasn't exactly paid dividends either.
piplip87 wrote: » FF and FG need to step upto the plate and form a government. After this election hard choices will need to be made. If it comes down to increasing dole by 200 million or pumping the 200 Million to employers to help get the back on Thier feet SF would choose the former for short term electoral gains. Where as the latter would take longer to work but it will get people back to work. I'd say SF and the PBP crowd will have Thier eyes on corporate tax been raised quite substantially again. It would be extremely interesting to see how the manifestos will costed after all this has passed.
landofthetree wrote: » Yep SF and their hilarious claim that they would lead a left wing government on counting day was a joke.
landofthetree wrote: » The other parties can form a new government. They have 125TDs. Only need 79. They are running away because its austerity for years ahead.New election needed in Sep/Oct.
solidasarock wrote: » I just think we really lucked out with the timing of this crisis and have a experienced government at the helm and not a bunch of new ministers wondering what the office wifi password is.