sm333 wrote: » I have found serious solace here at times when speaking to people in real life about these exams freaked me out. There's enough competition in the real world legal industry, people openly sharing notes and encouragement here is the most welcome change. Let's keep this space kind and supportive, we've all worked really hard and don't need anyone, least of all each other, diminishing that.
L.E.D wrote: » Just been told that the law society has said that you can sit the EU and tort exams both now and the summer. So you can resit in summer if you fail.
Louis Litt wrote: » If thats the case, do you think they will just have an open sitting even allow those who were not registered for this sitting to sit them in the summer?
iamanengine wrote: » Ok I’ve decided to go for Tort, what do people think about these topics: Land/Rylands/Nuisance Trespass to Person Passing Off Vicarious Occupiers Products Negligence PEL/NM Nervous Shock Animals/Fire Red Ipsa Concurrent Limitations Damages Defamation Professional
20082014 wrote: » Excuse my ignorance but what’s PEL/NM?
iamanengine wrote: » Apologies, Pure Economic Loss/Negligent Misstatement
rightytighty wrote: » What did people think of EU, did anyone else find the Free Movement of Workers/Citizenship question very difficult to read?
20082014 wrote: » Thanks! Im covering pretty much the same but hoping defamation, res ipsa or liability for animals don't come up as I have just skimmed over them! are you doing employers liability?
iamanengine wrote: » Ok I’ve decided to go for Tort, what do people think about these topics: Land/Rylands/Nuisance Trespass to Person Passing Off Vicarious Occupiers Products NegligencePEL/NM Nervous Shock Animals/FireRed Ipsa Concurrent Limitations Damages DefamationProfessional
isawitfirst wrote: » Very difficult, weird wording! And was it just me or was it kind of hard to find something he could claim on citizenship when he was still living in Belgium?
iamanengine wrote: » Would anyone be willing to send me notes on Employers? Seems like a lot of people are doing it and I have nothing on it
JCormac wrote: » Essentially the same minus what's in bold and plus Employers Liability. List seems pretty solid. Am I right in thinking that if Limitations were to come up it would be in Essay format?
iamanengine wrote: » Not sure about essay or problem question although I imagine it's a topic that does lend itself to a problem Q fairly well, main reason I am covering is that there were two fairly big cases in 2019 - Green v Hardiman and Sullivan v Ireland
SwD wrote: » He was a citizen of France and a student in Dublin. His mother was originally from Belgium.
rightytighty wrote: » It was my last question and i was stuck for time, I just mentioned Bidar allows for restrictions on giving grants, that the tax requirements might be seen as charges under Gravier, and then threw in it I think it’s Article 6 of 492/2011 - really just a wild stab haha but I think he’s a nice marker and my first 4 were quite strong I think
DUMSURFER wrote: » Hey everyone, hope EU went great. Any chance one of you lovely people could send on pictures of the paper? It would be greatly appreciated and anyone who does, I’ll pray every night until the results come out that you pass!
Lawgrad101 wrote: » What was the turn out like for EU?
EAL2019 wrote: » I was in the red cow, in the room I was in I counted 100 desks (as in 10x10) and it was about 75% full I’d say. Dunno if that was representative of the other rooms. They also staggered us going in to/leaving the exams so it was one big rush, so ended up getting about 7 mins extra I think There were also far fewer people hanging around before it from what I could tell!
