Jeremiah25 wrote: » Would imagine all of this hullabaloo would have to be taken into account in the marking?
PerryMason2020 wrote: » I can't imagine why. One is either ready for them or they aren't and if one is prepared then all the external issues won't matter. I say this as someone who has crammed at the last minute myself, knowing that I should have been far better prepared. Sure look at the profession we're all trying to get into. It's extremely stressful, you get things thrown at you last minute and need to be able to adapt and keep your head. These exams really aren't hard, they aren't even in the top 100 of hard exams. I think the issue is that people cram at the last minute too much and cherry pick too much and that doesn't always work out. I know myself from doing it.
spygirl wrote: » So how was property?
rightytighty wrote: » They are hard exams. Come on.
Sineaddh wrote: » The government are doing the complete opposite to encouraging people to go to work. Everyone is being told to work from home.
PerryMason2020 wrote: » She changed the format - a lot more of the pick a or b type questions. But all in all not a bad paper.
Law1997 wrote: » I agree with this 100%. No offence to anyone struggling but Christ if you’re not passing these what firm will be willing to invest in you.
BlackhallPlz wrote: » Your comments are unhelpful. You’ve made your decision on tomorrow, now I think you should refrain from commenting on this further.
Birdlaw101 wrote: » Putting other people down won't make you happy - just keep the head down and focus on your own exams.
the baby bull elephant wrote: » It's because it was a different examiner, Neil Maddox did this one. Was nearly thrown by how much choice there was, could have answered another two questions. Was very pressed for time at the end but I really think I've passed it this time. Just worried it was so easy they'll expect more than usual.
HappyKitten62 wrote: » Is it necessary to cover like 17 topics for tort or am I doing wayyy too much?!
Reya10 wrote: » People fail these exams for lots of different reasons. Most of us work full time and then come home at 6/7 in the evening and struggle to get a couple of hours of study in, that in itself makes them extremely difficult imo. I guarantee ye there are senior associates/partners at every major law firm who failed one or more of them in the past! With the events of the day maybe we should keep the smug comments to ourselves
PerryMason2020 wrote: » Sorry, just to clarify, I agree 100% that the amount of work that goes into them makes them hard and a challenge, the volume of information that's needed to be covered etc on top of balancing daily life is quite draining. What I meant by saying I didn't think they were hard, is that the actual paper i.e. the questions asked, that's not hard (IMO). I found the paper side of things very similar to the exams I did in college.
rightytighty wrote: » Those two hours between the announcement and clarification on the exams really took their pound of flesh. Fading big time
law_struggles wrote: » What are you lads and lasses predicting for tort?
HappyKitten62 wrote: » I think this forum is a little toxic. Its good for questions etc but other than that - it freaks me out and hypes up the exams more than in necessary! Limit the time you spend on it, it’ll help you in the long run.