Leroy42 wrote: » He has already got that covered. Its all just fake news!https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1237842710674812928
Leroy42 wrote: » He has already got that covered. Its all just fake news!
pixelburp wrote: » And yet again, where is the journalistic unity to hound his attempts to wriggle out of a genuine question? He's literally shooting the messenger, dismissing his inadequate, flailing response to a potential national crisis. Ok, we don't see the follow-up to that short clip, but I've never got the sense the rest of the press corp ever bother backing up their slighted colleague...
Water John wrote: » Trump says it will be gone in 2 months, FFS. Not sure who he was quoting.
Days after being near Trump and Pence, Brazilian official tests positive for the virus, reports say. A senior Brazilian government official who visited Mar-a-Lago days ago, and was in close proximity to President Trump and Vice President Mike Pence, has tested positive for the new coronavirus, according to the several Brazilian news outlets. Fábio Wajngarten, President Jair Bolsonaro’s communications chief, was at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s oceanfront resort in Florida, as part of Brazilian government delegation. Members of that group dined with Mr. Trump on Saturday. Mr. Wajngarten tested positive for the virus after returning home with flu-like symptoms. He is awaiting the results of a second test to confirm the diagnosis, according to the newspaper Estadão.
Quin_Dub wrote: » That's his "Gone by April when the weather improves" story line. The fact that he continues to persist with this kind of stuff just indicates that he has likely been forced into some of the more significant actions against his own views. Delusional
Britain is excluded from the travel ban because it is "doing a good job in tackling the coronavirus"
sid waddell wrote: » There's some bad news coming out of Ukraine for Biden. Zelensky has fired his cabinet, and the prosecutor general, a guy called Ruslan Ryaboshapka, who was widely regarded as good at his job and of high integrity. It looks like there's a big changing of the guard to go in a much more pro-Russian and certainly pro-oligarch direction. That means Ukraine is likely to co-operate in doing what the Russians and Trump want in terms of manufacturing fake "dirt" on Biden.
EltonJohn69 wrote: » Anyone else think that after the Biden Sanders debate.... that democrats might have serious reservations about going with Biden... I feel he will really struggle if things get intense...
eire4 wrote: » Well it will be interesting to see what Biden's responses to Sanders questions are. Sanders took the very unusual step the other day at a press conference of basically saying exactly what he was going to ask Biden.
duploelabs wrote: » Throwing a feint
20Cent wrote: » Looking at MAGA twitter they still think it's a hoax and the Dems are reacting hysterically just to bring the stock market and Trump down. This is the nightmare scenario where the constant attack on the media and experts is going to result in a lot of unnecessary death.
VinLieger wrote: » Whats their cognitive dissonance reponse when global figures are brought up?
Poldsgold wrote: » The problem is, with how things are going he is in danger of doing worse than even Bush's first term, which would be the case if he drops below 19,700 prior to the election. This man is failing, badly.
listermint wrote: » Tbf you do have an increasing penchant to jump to a middle ground defence for trump regardless of how abjectly wrong he acts. This has worsened over time. I don't think it's an insult to point out the facts. Would you vote for trump 2020 genuine question
Manic Moran wrote: » Forgive me for thinking that accuracy and a willingness to consider possible reasonable alternative explanations should not be casualties of The Great Boards Trump Pile-On. Is “middle ground” a bad place to be? Indeed, what I find telling is that the complaint was not that I posted that Trump was wrong, but that I was not suitably insulting when I did so. Really? I saw this about eight years ago on the other side. That Trump is more deserving of scorn than his predecessor is a given, but that does not mean that valid positions should be ignored any more now than then. Genuine answer. If you will recall I am on record as saying I did not vote for Trump in 2016. I see no reason that he is any more deserving of my vote today, and find it unlikely that this position will change.
aloyisious wrote: » OK, I'll give you your point that what's happening here in respect of Don can seem like a stampede without thorough inspection of his actions, as there's so much input from one side as against that from the other. However it's not at this stage a rush to judgement, it's now almost a jaded reaction to his stupidity. Practically everything Don Trump does and says compounds the trouble he made for the US & the world sometimes less than a hour or two earlier in the same day. We are all global neighbours. Sometimes I think there's not much point in debating anymore about his presidency, so much time is tied up by too-ing and fro-ing about his latest stupidity, BUT that would be dumbing-down and letting him off the hook. Unfortunately we cant debate with him and are left venting our annoyance on each other, sometimes to the enjoyment of people who come here to rile us up on both sides.
Runaways wrote: » I’m not even remotely shocked to read this. There are no depths the man won’t sink tohttps://twitter.com/sethabramson/status/1238216578161926145?s=21
everlast75 wrote: » It's definitely on brand for him, but I'll wait for a second source.