Breacnua wrote: » October
CiaranS93 wrote: » Anyone going to email them back?
Greentea12 wrote: » Tried calling the number in the email but it doesn't even ring..
Sineaddh wrote: » I’m extremely angry at their response! A blanket decision would have been better for all My dad is 68.. how do I choose between sitting an exam and possibly risking infection!?
Hamerzan Sickles wrote: » For what it's worth - for those of you who feel like getting a result in tort or EU has something hanging in the balance for it - it's extremely unlikely you're going to look back 20 years from now and say "I'm sure glad I crammed that evening and sat EU law the morning after an education lockdown was imposed by the government."
Sineaddh wrote: » What are you looking to find out?
Breacnua wrote: » I was told this
EAL2019 wrote: » Its not about maximising the result, its about being done tomorrow and being able to relax and enjoy my summer vs potentially still studying and stressing in June. These exams have such an impact on people's mental health, its very reasonable for people to want to get them over with
bobsyourbrief wrote: » Did you phone or e-mail them? I can't get a response off either. Results are usually released the start of May for the March sitting. Surely it'd be before then under these circumstances? How do the Law Society not have a cancelation protocol in place? I'm aware it's incredibly rare, but the possibility alone should mean they have these things planned for re-sittings in exceptional circumstances all ready to go.
ihatethesea wrote: » Has anyone made a decision yet? I'm leaning toward resitting and would love to know if anybody else is too?
CiaranS93 wrote: » Why would they be offering a refund if they were going to reschedule....