ohnonotgmail wrote: » who mentioned masks? they are a waste of time for people not already infected.
Deleted User wrote: » LOL
Wear a facemask if you are sickIf you are sick: You should wear a facemask when you are around other people (e.g., sharing a room or vehicle) and before you enter a healthcare provider’s office. If you are not able to wear a facemask (for example, because it causes trouble breathing), then you should do your best to cover your coughs and sneezes, and people who are caring for you should wear a facemask if they enter your room. Learn what to do if you are sick. If you are NOT sick: You do not need to wear a facemask unless you are caring for someone who is sick (and they are not able to wear a facemask). Facemasks may be in short supply and they should be saved for caregivers.
Take steps to protect yourselfClean your hands oftenWash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds especially after you have been in a public place, or after blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing. If soap and water are not readily available, use a hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol. Cover all surfaces of your hands and rub them together until they feel dry. Avoid touching your eyes, nose, and mouth with unwashed hands.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Note that they do not say to use face masks to protect yourself. because they dont that. You wear a face mask if you are sick to protect others.
Deleted User wrote: » This is nonsense that began to be circulate online in the past two months.
SozBbz wrote: » Circulate online? Every expert, Cheif Medical Officer etc is saying the same thing. But we should believe you, some internet randomer. Grand so.
Deleted User wrote: » You should research it for yourself. Look for some peer reviewed studies, medical guidelines, medical textbooks etc. Filter out the tabloid articles that started popping up in the past months; assuming that you know how to do this.
Antares35 wrote: » Have no desire to wade in on an online v WHO v tabloid debate but the CDC states that the virus "droplets can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs". It isn't much of a leap therefore to assume that a mask, which will provide a barrier over the mouth and nose, might offer a form of protection to an uninfected person?https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/transmission.html I might be cynical but is it possible that the advice for uninfected people not to use masks is informed by a need to preserve supplies?
Princess Calla wrote: » No I think its more from the point of view that wearing a mask is alien to most people, so you will spend more time touching your face and readjusting it. The more you touch your face the higher the risk of infection. Plus the masks aren't a snug fit so potentially airborne can still sneak in. But they will act as a barrier against the main exhale of an infected person, but again not a snug fit so potential for escape, but better than no barrier.
SozBbz wrote: » All of this, plus they don't cover your eyes, so again not giving real protection. Also, they're more effective preventing sick people from passing the virus than protecting the uninfected. So if we do only have a limited amount, arent they better being used by said sick people? Or for medical professinals who have to get up close and personal with those already infected? Keep your distance, wash your hands and be sensible.
iamwhoiam wrote: » No anti bacterial wipes left in any shop today .I bought cheap own brand baby wipes and a large bottle of Dettol .I will pour the dettol over the wipes and uses them to wipe down surfaces .Just a thought if anyone is looking for wipes . I also brought my own wipe to Lidl and Dunnes as neither had any facilities to clean the trolly handle .Fair play to Super Valu they had wipes and spray at the door .
Raconteuse wrote: » It's anti viral stuff that would be best though, yet nearly every disinfecting agent is anti bacterial.
leeside11 wrote: » Was told today a spritz of vodka on the hands would work as a last resort, don't know how true this it, though being alcohol maybe..
sioda wrote: » Alcohol content isn't high enough in most vodkas cases