Motherof123 wrote: » Lucky you
cjmc wrote: » Me too. When I think it's fine all I get is a link
izzyflusky wrote: » I'm currently on leave and don't have access to the research but I teach infection control as part of my job and the latest is a tendency to lean more towards alcohol hand rubs, mostly because of better adherence to its use and people tend to use a better technique compared to soap and water. It is also what we as trainers are being advised to teach. Mind you, hands still need to be visibly clean and as I mentioned before, soap and water is a MUST after going to the toilet.
murpho999 wrote: » So I think it's wrong of people to claim that sanitsers are essential and soap and water is not good enough.
carltonleon wrote: » I think you probably need both... So for example in work you go out to the toilets and then you wash your hands but to get out of the toilets you have to open a door by pulling on a handle, and then to get back into our section you have to swipe an ID card and type in a 4 digit code on a keypad and then pull a handle to open the door .... so basically your hand washing has been negated by opening doors and using a keypad that 50 or so people could have used/opened in the past hour ... so when you get back to your desk if you have hand sanitizer then you can use it to make sure that your hands are fully clean and virus free
Motherof123 wrote: » That's so true. I will not be returning to one place anyway they boarded up the door with boxes and you have to order from the door they wear masks and gloves Bit dramatic. Didn't put the prices up but told me stocks will run out so buy now
NIMAN wrote: » This is taking it all to extreme levels, there is no way you'll avoid germs if you start thinking about where they are. Desk, mouse, phone, keyboards, mugs, door handles, etc......All have germs. Don't overthink it or you'll go all OCD
frillyleaf wrote: » Where is this happening? How frightening that must be for older people to see that. Surely this is not a chemist behaving in this way
carltonleon wrote: » I generally don’t and have no issue with door handles etc and was just giving that as an example but I think the point i was making is that people are trying to be extra careful at the moment so both washing and sanitizing in different situations may give them piece of mind...
Deleted User wrote: » Hand sanitizer is a waste of time and money. You get Covid19 primarily by breathing in airborne droplets. Going around in public without a mask, rubbing overpriced sanitizer on your hands is akin to driving a car with a helmet but no seatbelt. By all means wash your hands regularly; it's a good habit. It will not make a lick of difference to your chance of infection.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » Yeah people should really listen to you and ignore the advice from doctors. Breathing in airborne is only one way of contracting the virus. You can catch it from touching surfaces that infected people have touched and subsequently touching your face. washing your hands regularly reduces that risk.
iamwhoiam wrote: » I think people should listen to the WHO and doctors and not random ill informed posters online .
"The virus is thought to spread mainly from person-to-person. Between people who are in close contact with one another (within about 6 feet). Through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs or sneezes. These droplets can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs. Can someone spread the virus without being sick? People are thought to be most contagious when they are most symptomatic (the sickest). Some spread might be possible before people show symptoms; there have been reports of this occurring with this new coronavirus, but this is not thought to be the main way the virus spreads. Spread from contact with contaminated surfaces or objects It may be possible that a person can get COVID-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose, or possibly their eyes, but this is not thought to be the main way the virus spreads."
Deleted User wrote: » There is little to no evidence that it is spread by touching an object and then touching ones face. It may be possible but anyone with any knowledge on the subject will tell you it is not the primary infection vector. There is a mountain of evidence that it spreads primarily via respitory droplets. Which should be common sense. People are being told to wash hands in order to avoid a panic. People like to feel like they are doing something. The effectiveness of masks is being downplayed because they are in short supply.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/transmission.html
ohnonotgmail wrote: » so it is possible to be infected by touching surfaces so washing your hands is not a complete waste of time as you insist.
Deleted User wrote: » Skydivers wear helmets because sometimes they collide in mid-air or bump their head upon landing. Wearing a helmet is not a waste of time. Wearing a helmet but not a parachute is a waste of time. Do you see how something can be either a waste of time, or not a waste of time ? The order in which protection measures are implemented is extremely important. If you are walking around in public without a mask, regular hand-washing will have a negligible effect on your likelihood of infection.