Breacnua wrote: » duty to mitgate -- there is many cases that u learn for other parts that can be used here - she just wants u to think outside the box
CarrigView wrote: » Anybody have an idea where's handy to park around Neptune Stadium? Don't venture over to the North side so often!
20082014 wrote: » I am just wondering how many cases do you tend to mention per exam question? I know it differs depending on the question itself but for a general problem question on a specific topic, what should the average be? Also, if you're short on time in the exam would it be sufficient to scribble down a case name beside a test for example, just to show that the case relates to that test, if you don't have time to go into any other details of it?
ihatethesea wrote: » I think the general rule is for each significant and important point you make in an answer you should be able to give 3 cases to back it up, for smaller points one case should do. If your running out of time you should scribble everything you know, you wont lose marks for it and you might gain some if the case is relevant, whereas you defo wont gain marks for a blank page I ran out of time in criminal and at the end I just did bullet points with cases and concise information, hoping i get some marks for it!
rightytighty wrote: » Does anyone have the October 19 Company Exam Report? Or even any guidance on what they were looking for on the Corporate Borrowing Q?
Sineaddh wrote: » CONTRACT offer/acceptance, consideration, promissory estoppel, consumer protection, exemption clauses, misrep/mistake, remedies. Think Ill be ok with this? Any other recommendations of must-cover? Thanks!
DFMCD190384 wrote: » Would I be safe with the following in Property: Succession Finding AP Changes brought about with 2009 Act Co ownership Reg of land Family Mortgages Any advice is very welcome. #braindead
CiaranS93 wrote: » Tort Is tort similar to criminal where the questions are mixed so you can just learn the main tests and cases per topic?
sm333 wrote: » Anyone else getting really confused between common and mutual mistake for contact??
ahona wrote: » I dont know if this will help but COMMON MISTAKE - A wants to sell Corn, B wants to buy ---> but corn has perished. MUTUAL MISTAKE A has two cars Audi and Ford B wants to buy a car. B thinks A is selling Audi. But A actually meant Ford. (sorry if I ended up infantalising the confusion)
DRMC wrote: » Hi, Would any kind soul be willing to send me Family Property notes, please? I feel like I haven’t got enough covered. Thank you very much.
bobbyness wrote: » Sums it up perfectly
nmurphy1441 wrote: » Common mistake is both parties making the same mistake as one another... Mutual mistake is both parties still make a mistake but they are different mistakes.... If that’s any help! What’s confusing you?
Law1997 wrote: » Hi it’s the worrier again... For Contract, will I pass if I have knowledge of offer & acceptance, consideration, intention to create, estoppel, capacity, terms, duress, mistake, misrep, exclusion clauses, consumer contracts, undue influence, discharge & remedies By knowledge I mean I know as much of it as is in my manual but when reading the reports there’s a few nitty gritty bits in problem qs that I don’t have info on, and then she sometimes will ask an entire essay on duty to mitigate loss when it’s such a tiny section in my chapter on remedies. Will this get me the pass? I feel like I nearly should have gone outside the manual but no time for that now feel like I’m at a disadvantage - my manual is up to date but there’s always something I’m missing.
mydogwentroof wrote: » The entire course 😹
Redhighking wrote: » The manual is more then enough and by reading the reports gives you an idea of what the examiner expects. Remember you only need 50 to pass - key cases and relevant legislation.
