CiaranS93 wrote: » Exact same. Used National Tourism v Scotland and National Tourism v Colgan. All fail except last one if they can show it involves some form of education/teaching/knowledge as per Re Shaw And under section 2 has to be of public benefit
Jenosul wrote: » No sorry it was the proprietary I wrote on is that a fail? Thank you for reply
tommyq94 wrote: » Does any kind soul have any revision guides for Contract they would be willing to share, or have any predictions?
EmmaO94 wrote: » Equity Answer me honestly.... 3 really solid answers, but could only answer one element of the note q, and was very iffy about the second half of q4 (wrote plenty on half secret trusts but the second half of question was out of my reach) Would this be enough to scrape a pass?
ihatethesea wrote: » I literally feel its so unpredictable after last year with no Offer, Acceptance or Cons. Protection! Expecting they will surely make a show for sure this year?!
mydogwentroof wrote: » I said the last one would seek to be classified under S3(1)(d) talked about Coughlan and referred to s49 of the 1961 act re the 10%
CiaranS93 wrote: » Could you clarify how section 49 relates? I thought it was where there were two purposes present you get rid of the non charitable one?
leavingcert17 wrote: » Did you pass the question?
CiaranS93 wrote: » I was so underprepared in the last sitting.. Only had 2-3 solid questions and the rest was a load of BS. I still got 50 when I was sure I failed.
iamanengine wrote: » Also do people think I will lose much marks for only referring to English cases on that Q? Question said to make reference to the jurisprudence of Irish courts and where appropriate to the jurisprudence of courts of other jurisdictions. I only had 1 Irish case in my notes but forgot it
iamanengine wrote: » Anyone think this is a big deal? Would hate to fail just cos of that
CiaranS93 wrote: » What's peoples thoughts/predictions for EU?
rightytighty wrote: » I did
Jeremiah25 wrote: » Highly doubt you'd fail just on that regard. Once you have shown a broad knowledge of the applicable law I'm sure you'd get most marks!
godfather2 wrote: » No, I think you will be fine. Now get ready for the next one. Dissecting the paper too much is never a good thing. You never know with equity, it's the biggest coin toss of all of them apparently. Get the head down or the coffee on, you've got the next mountain on the horizon to deal with, forget the last one. Does you no good.
iamanengine wrote: » Thanks guys, over thinking things. Feel like I did well on the question despite having no Irish cases and my other 4 Q's were all decent, so should be fine, just worrying! On to Company
jewels652 wrote: » For Eu my main topics are: Citizenship Direct Effect Competition Art 101 and 102 Goods Judicial review Institutions Thinking of adding: Workers Preliminary reference procedure General principles
Jeremiah25 wrote: » What topics are you sticking to for company?
CiaranS93 wrote: » Yea I can't do competition but I know it comes up every year ugh I hate it. I'm doing: General principles Institutions FMG FMW Direct Effect and Supremacy Citizenship Equality Infringement Hoping that will have me covered but open to suggestions that don't involve competition
jewels652 wrote: » I think those topics will have you covered maybe add in preliminary reference procedure. Does infringement usually comes up?
CiaranS93 wrote: » Think it came up last sitting but just did it because pretty straight forward. Are preliminary ref and judicial quite short?
jewels652 wrote: » They are short and straight forward handy topics. I want to add in general principles but is a long topic. I wonder do I have enough anyway?
cowboy123456 wrote: » hey guys, for anyone who has previously sat eu how hard is it compared to others or has anybody an idea of pass rates for it?
