Beefy78 wrote: » But it wasn't pointless. You've explained exactly what the point was in your post. Yes it could have been another drug but they made a drug up which enabled them to take the 3D format and use it to provide a unique visual which enhanced the experience for the viewer.
Marty McFly wrote: » You're clearly not getting my point so this will be my last post on it. It was pointless because it was a gimmick to shoe horn 3D into the film I find anything to do with 3D gimmicky and feel it would have been a much better film had they taken that aspect out of it. It didn't enhance the experience for me or a lot of people instead it took away from the film and felt pointless, as I said it took some scenes which could have been suspenseful and ruined them because of silly 3D slow mo's.
Outkast_IRE wrote: » Meant to be out this weekend, local cinema not showing it anyway.
jaykhunter wrote: » I've seen Dredd in 3D and 2D and the slow-mo is much less effective/interesting in 2D. I wouldn't consider 3D being shoe-horned as it's tied to such an important part of the film (the drug slo-mo). I suppose you could cut out showing the effects of slo-mo completely but I think that'd make for a worse film.
salacious crumb wrote: » if everyone who's signed the petition bought an extra DVD or Blu-Ray (either for themselves or as a present for a friend) or rented/bought it on iTunes and Netflix it will send the loudest signal yet that WE WANT MORE DREDD!
ScumLord wrote: » I don't see this going anywhere if their expecting everyone to buy a second copy of the film. It's now beginning to sound like one of the producers is behind this movement. It's rare enough for me to buy any film, there's no way I'm buying two copies.
Dozen Wicked Words wrote: » Haven't seen it in 3d or at the cinema, watched it on Sky, thought it was great fun, and the slo-mo bits were all spot on, apart from ma-ma's final scene which didn't really work for me. Anderson was what I imagined she should be like and Karl Urban kept his lid on throughout and nailed Dredd for me. Would definitely head out to cinema to see a sequel.
Tom Mann Centuria wrote: » Saw a new post, thought there might be fresh talk of a sequel, hopes dashed again. Time to watch it again now though.
pixelburp wrote: » I'd say the TV show is dead
Listen, I would love to make it, I’m on the record saying that a bunch of times. I don’t know if that’s gonna happen. I think that the guys that own the rights to Dredd, Rebellion, I think they’re developing something called ‘Mega-City One’ and it would just be great to see more Dredd, whether it’s with me or not, it doesn’t matter. I’m a fan of Dredd and there’s so many great stories there. I’d love to see them. And I have no doubt that, someday, someone will make it. It’s just a matter of time.