nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Tom Young

This is the new FE1 Exam Thread

This is a link to the old one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055143169

This is a link to the next one: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056907164

Sorry, I'm aware we are in the throws of FE1 season, but due to a server issue, a new thread was required. Old chats and posts below - Thanks!

Mod warning in post #1205: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=88514663&postcount=1205

Mod warning in post #2555: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=91819622&postcount=2555

Mod warning in post #2593: http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=92025688&postcount=2593

Moderator: The above warnings mean it is not ok to buy, sell or swap (trade) any exam materials in this thread. Exam grids are the only exception. You may request and exchange exam grids but at no point will money be allowed to change hands for them.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

ryansmith171

Hi lawstudentirl
I seen you post on a law forum and i am struggling with a past property law exam question if you could help me it would be great!

bobbyness

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

Anyone on here attempt Q8 on the criminal paper?

Scared me too much to even touch it!

I was woefully under prepared on the later Thefts and frauds acts Looking at it now I'd have said

a) Handling and Possession of stolen property - Theft and Fraud Act
b) Forgery and using false instrument - Theft and fraud
c) Contempt of court
d) Harassment - NFOAP (Maybe incitement against her too)

lawstudentirl

ryansmith171 wrote: »

Hi lawstudentirl
I seen you post on a law forum and i am struggling with a past property law exam question if you could help me it would be great!

Yeah no worries, I’ll do my best. I sat property last time so it’s not exactly fresh in my mind. What’s the question?

nmurphy1441

bobbyness wrote: »

Scared me too much to even touch it! I was woefully under prepared on the later Thefts and frauds acts Looking at it now I'd have said

a) Handling and Possession of stolen property - Theft and Fraud Act
b) Forgery and using false instrument - Theft and fraud
c) Contempt of court
d) Harassment - NFOAP (Maybe incitement against her too)

I didn’t even think of handling and possession of stolen propert!!!!!! Disaster!!! I put down guilty as an accessory to theft!!! Really annoyed with that!

Had that for part (b) along with False accounting

Had contempt in the face of the court too along with scandalising the court

Put down harassment and assault for (d) along with a public order offence

nmurphy1441

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

I said novus actus interveniens, with Elaine as the victim possibly breaking the chain of causation for the criminal act [attempted suicide]. But it was a toss up between that and unlawful and dangerous manslaughter, I just didn't think any of the cases were of the same applicability there.

Could it be an example of transfered mens rea too?

bobbyness

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

I didn’t even think of handling and possession of stolen propert!!!!!! Disaster!!! I put down guilty as an accessory to theft!!! Really annoyed with that!

Had that for part (b) along with False accounting

Had contempt in the face of the court too along with scandalising the court

Put down harassment and assault for (d) along with a public order offence

Much easier afterwards with statutes in hand

Accessory to theft is definitely a consideration for the a) Evidence claims to have not been part of it - Would still have to prove no part in it.

and assault is a good one to include in d) - R v Ireland - Silent phone calls can amount to an assault, with psychiatric injury being the harm.

You've got a well rounded answer there in my opinion!

bobbyness

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

I didn’t even think of handling and possession of stolen propert!!!!!! Disaster!!! I put down guilty as an accessory to theft!!! Really annoyed with that!

Had that for part (b) along with False accounting

Had contempt in the face of the court too along with scandalising the court

Put down harassment and assault for (d) along with a public order offence

Re d) Only reason I'm thinking incitement potentially is - Applin v Race Relations Board - Where they distributed flyers and letters/emails trying to stop a family adopting a black child.

Hamerzan Sickles

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

Could it be an example of transfered mens rea too?

I was thinking that too but it would be quite technical because the aim would have to be the same i.e. murdering himself and murdering her. But I think the law considers suicide and murder distinct so it wouldn't amount to transferred mens rea. You can always argue that it isn't though... but if it wasn't you wouldn't really be advising him of that.

CMUL

eLawGirl wrote: »

Very well, lovely invigilators, only issue was the hall was freezing

Really, crap I hate being cold was it unbearable? I was thinking there would be very little heat in a big hall like that

Hamerzan Sickles

Okay, I'm only getting a chance to look at Constitutional now. What topics should I prioritise? Aiming for quality over quantity here.

Molly347

the clock in neptune is very hard to see from the back as well

nmurphy1441

bobbyness wrote: »

Re d) Only reason I'm thinking incitement potentially is - Applin v Race Relations Board - Where they distributed flyers and letters/emails trying to stop a family adopting a black child.

The distribution of insulting flyers I put down as S7 Public Order Act 1994

bobbyness

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

The distribution of insulting flyers I put down as S7 Public Order Act 1994

Definitely. We only need 50% to pass anyway so here's hoping!

iamanengine

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

Okay, I'm only getting a chance to look at Constitutional now. What topics should I prioritise? Aiming for quality over quantity here.

Oireachtas - Internal rules, Locus Standi, Family, Fair Procedures, Liberty, President/AG, Interpretation

These seem to be the ones most are predicting/banking on

EmmaO94

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

Could it be an example of transfered mens rea too?

I went down the transferred malice route myself... in the moment it was the only thing that jumped out at me! If I'm way off, at least that part was only half the question - felt I had a v solid answer for bail

OMGWACA

Hi all,

Looking for a sample answer for Company October 2017, Qs 3;

"The introduction of the Summary Approval Procedure contained in Chapter 7 of Part 4 of the CA2014 has resulted in a unified approach provided that certain safeguards are met. The key safeguards are that the members of the company must resolve in favour of the compnay engaging in the activity and that the directors must make a declaration of solvency.

You are required to discuss this statement having particular regard to the rationale of the two safeguards referred to in the statement. In your answer you must cite all relevant case and statute law."

I'd really appreciate any steer on this!

Hamerzan Sickles

EmmaO94 wrote: »

I went down the transferred malice route myself... in the moment it was the only thing that jumped out at me! If I'm way off, at least that part was only half the question - felt I had a v solid answer for bail

Yeah, I was annoyed with myself because I wasn't entirely sure which topic of law part (a) was and my presumption of innocence answer was perfect. Was also annoyed by the Special Criminal Court coming up with the Circuit Court -- I had learned off his exam report on the SCC only. An exam of what could have beens.

iamanengine wrote: »

Oireachtas - Internal rules, Locus Standi, Family, Fair Procedures, Liberty, President/AG, Interpretation

These seem to be the ones most are predicting/banking on

Brilliant, thanks iamanengine! Is that what you are banking on yourself?

nmurphy1441

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

Yeah, I was annoyed with myself because I wasn't entirely sure which topic of law part (a) was and my presumption of innocence answer was perfect. Was also annoyed by the Special Criminal Court coming up with the Circuit Court -- I had learned off his exam report on the SCC only. An exam of what could have beens.

Brilliant, thanks iamanengine! Is that what you are banking on yourself?

I was in the same boat.... I had the SCC down to a tee but nothing for the first part!!!

iamanengine

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

Brilliant, thanks iamanengine! Is that what you are banking on yourself?

No worries! Yeah pretty much, they are the ones I hope to know well.

Other ones I am covering but maybe won't know as well are property/livelihood, equality, referendums, freedom of expression, international relations, non-delegation

Hamerzan Sickles

iamanengine wrote: »

No worries! Yeah pretty much, they are the ones I hope to know well.

Other ones I am covering but maybe won't know as well are property/livelihood, equality, referendums, freedom of expression, international relations, non-delegation

Alright, I'm going to try my best to follow your lead before I inevitably fall asleep (was up very late last night cramming for criminal) so thanks again!

bobbyness

What are people banking on coming up for contract law?

nmurphy1441

bobbyness wrote: »

What are people banking on coming up for contract law?

I was hoping someone was going to ask that!!!! It’s my next one too so hoping to get a good bit covered!

I think mistake is due a run. Consumer protection is a definite, maybe 2 questions. Exclusion clauses, penalty clauses, misrep....

iamanengine

Hamerzan Sickles wrote: »

Alright, I'm going to try my best to follow your lead before I inevitably fall asleep (was up very late last night cramming for criminal) so thanks again!

Best of luck, hope for our sake I'm right!

ahona

nmurphy1441 wrote: »

I put down aggravated burglary if it can be proved he entered with the knife on him!

I didnt write Burglary or Agg Burglary

this was supposed to be my good answer

BRB while I go and cry in one corner

https://media2.giphy.com/media/j0qSbeNFuzjhXKFVSP/giphy.gif?cid=790b76116e639fde0b2aea8fcf2e4d3426e0c8afd51d265d&rid=giphy.gif

CiaranS93

iamanengine wrote: »

Oireachtas - Internal rules, Locus Standi, Family, Fair Procedures, Liberty, President/AG, Interpretation

These seem to be the ones most are predicting/banking on

Nearly guaranteed at least one Q on SOP as comes up in some form 95% of the time. Although if time is tight maybe don't bother as it is pretty big

nmurphy1441

ahona wrote: »

I didnt write Burglary or Agg Burglary

this was supposed to be my good answer

BRB while I go and cry in one corner

https://media2.giphy.com/media/j0qSbeNFuzjhXKFVSP/giphy.gif?cid=790b76116e639fde0b2aea8fcf2e4d3426e0c8afd51d265d&rid=giphy.gif

That’s only a small part of the question so I wouldn’t worry about it! There was a lot going on in it!

eLawGirl

CMUL wrote: »

Really, crap I hate being cold was it unbearable? I was thinking there would be very little heat in a big hall like that

I kept my scarf and coat on so definitely wear something warm and comfortable if you feel the cold!

mydogwentroof

EQUITY

Anybody banking on certain topics? Can be for literally no reason, I'm all ears.

nmurphy1441

mydogwentroof wrote: »

EQUITY

Anybody banking on certain topics? Can be for literally no reason, I'm all ears.

Injunctions Definite, mareva in particular due a run
Charitable trusts and cy pres in some form definitely
Trustees duties in some form definitely
3 certainties due a run, not on last 2/3 sittings
DMC possibly as not on last sitting
Undue influence as not on last sitting
Misrep and specific performance as not on last sitting

Just going by grid and last few sitting

user115

Constitutional

There was a question I read in past exams few days ago where it mentioned that this would be plaintiff was earning very little and a particular law required he have a certain amount of money for costs, what does that relate to? I imagine it's access to justice but I haven't covered it, what part of constit is it and what would I say briefly on it?