Esel wrote: » I didn't know the car was 7 years old.Still though, by offering what they did, they are effectively admitting responsibility. In this scenario I would be pushing for them to provide at least the new engine free of charge to you. The labour charge is more than enough of a hit for you to take, imo.
Augeo wrote: » At 7 years old and 45k kms if the car is used daily it's rarely getting a decent long run either ....... loads of cold running, short hops. Not really what 3.0 diesels are happy doing. It's no excuse but I'd consider the BMW offer quite fair all considered.
MetzgerMeister wrote: » It gets proper motorway drives at least twice a week and I look after it big time including the DPF condition.
GustavoFring wrote: » I think the offer is quite fair given the age of the car. .......... I would say it getting up to temp is a big thing with these engines though................
Augeo wrote: » Yup, no doubt .......... it's the 5 days of pootling about that I'd reckon aren't ideal. As I said it's no excuse for the engine to sh1t itself. A large percentage of the miles on it are "cold" miles for want of a better word. The damage (unless it's a factory defect) might well have been done years back under previous owner. Yup, x2.
GustavoFring wrote: » I would say it getting up to temp is a big thing with these engines though. I work in different locations but 25km into the office, especially in winter, doesn't even have the coolant heated up in mine, so the oil is obviously in the same boat.
vintagevrs wrote: » Is your gauge for coolant? Think mines is oil temp.
mfceiling wrote: » Lads who do you need to contact about traffic light sequences? On my road they've changed the light sequence where it seems they have put a timer at a set of lights....grand except one road has little traffic filtering out bar rush hour in the morning and the other road is out of a housing estate with about 20 houses in it. So now if you hit a red light on the main road you could wait upwards on a minute or more where nothing comes out of either road. This is causing a large back up on the main road and pushing back on to another large enough junction.
cadaliac wrote: » Still, not acceptable. Also, all diesels lead different lives. So, why aren't all the diesels that live on "cold miles" failing? I'll tell you why - they're not all bad designs.
wotzgoingon wrote: » Quick question that hopefully someone knows the answer to. My car rolls when parked in gear. All my cars over the years I always leave in second and pull up the hand brake. My current car the first time I noticed it was when I parked a bit of a slope and left it in second didn't pull up hand brake and car started to roll while I was still sitting in it so just pressed the brake and done a bit of testing just in case it was a fluke or wasn't engaged in gear but no my car rolls while in gear. Just thinking when I type this I should have tried other gears but I also put all my cars in second and never had a problem.
colm_mcm wrote: » It’ll roll indefinitely, or for a few inches? What car is it?
vintagevrs wrote: » Take the new engine to an indy now
MetzgerMeister wrote: » I will in me hole :pac: Gonna ask them if I can take part of the old engine to make a table from.
wotzgoingon wrote: » Just watched a interesting video on VVD. I knew about VVT(VANOS, VVT-i, etc...)and VVL(VTEC, MIVEC Neo VVL, etc...). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhsgdwUX1-w
MetzgerMeister wrote: » BMW are now covering 100% of the engine cost. This brings my bill down to 3k all in.