str8talkingguy wrote: » You want everyone that is accused of sexual assault arrested without any investigation?what a world its become where people even think thats how it could possibly work.
Boggles wrote: » Then why say "rape allegation". It is standard for the police to respond when called, they do a primary investigation like they did here. Spoke to Eye Witnesses, spoke to they guy who got assaulted and spoke to the little girl alone with her mother and then based on that arrested Stephen and charged him with assault. No one else has been arrested so far, whether they are actively investigating the sexual assault allegation, I couldn't tell you.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » I found the attitude on here from some to be genuinely eye-opening about the allegation.
MakingMovies2 wrote: » Brilliant, so we've resorted to dog whistles to defend yaxley Lennon have we?
Boggles wrote: » Really? Stephen is a pathological liar, career criminal and racist scum bag. Who is currently selling his 8 year old daughters alleged sexual assault and traumatic experience on his personal website. If Stephen doesn't give a flying fúck about his daughters well being, why do you expect anyone else to?
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » That's grand you have your opinion of him, but you're assuming his 8 yo daughter is lying about being sexually assaulted with no evidence. That's fine, it's just surprising. I can't think of anyone's child I would default to assuming they are lying about that.
Removalist wrote: » 3 middle aged men at centre parcs, no kids or family with them. Dirty animals got off light.
Boggles wrote: » I'm not assuming anything, I am not exploiting Stephens daughter for money, Stephen is. Again this is the type of pond scum you are dealing with.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » Yes you are. You have said so ffs. You assume he's of doing it for the clickbait that requires that she is lying.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » I thought everyone who allegedly assault people are arrested if they are identified or the police may have reason to believe they did it. I would never have thought they would just question the man there, take his details and let him go in this situation,no. I take your point, but it seems mad. They only take someone in to the station when an assault has witnesses, not on the back of a complaint?
brevity wrote: » Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon is his real name. I wonder why he changed it to Tommy Robinson
FTA69 wrote: » I hate Robinson and everything he stands for. Is it possible his girl was groped and he reacted to it? Yes it is. Is it also a fact Robinson is a serial liar and propagandist? Yes it is. Honestly we will have to wait and see what transpires. If there was an allegation of sexual assault then the cops will investigate it, whether they do a good job of that remains to be seen. I mean it’s easy to call “bullsh*t” on something like this considering who it is but it would be a particularly depraved thing for him to concoct, even for an utter scumbag and con artist like him. I don’t think definitively writing it off completely or embracing it wholeheartedly is the best thing to do here.
Chris_Heilong wrote: » Oh, did you get that from the Guardian newspaper? Tommy is not a hateful person, He called out all the muslim Pedos and Jihadis in his neighbourhood and was vilified for it even though he was proven 100% right years later, People who hate him are clearly brainwashed by very partisan media outlets.
easypazz wrote: » So 3 perverts spend the day molesting kids in a swimming pool and nobody notices anything until Tommys daughter goes and tells him.
Tasfasdf wrote: » Its good to see where the left stand here. A paedo molests a 8 year old but that's ignored because the dad hit the paedo and shouted the police let the paedo go. I understand why there are paedo hunters because they police are useless.
suicide_circus wrote: » i've no idea what happened, i wasn't there, could be a total hoax. i just dont think an 8 year old who says she got molested should be automatically disbelieved because of who her dad is.
Raconteuse wrote: » Exactly. I find it disconcerting to see the outright dismissal of his claim when some of the same people would accept it at face value if made by someone they don't dislike.
BanditLuke wrote: » Robinson is one the most recognisable faces in the UK and detested by the Muslim community. I don't think it's a stretch that somebody touched up his daughter to wind him up. There are some sick feckers out there
Dravokivich wrote: » Kids are very easily prompted by their parents. This one who has a very clear agenda. It's very hard to go straight to yeah she was a victim.
Boggles wrote: » He absolutely detests "foreign" child abusers, all though he seems fine with white ones.
SnakePlissken wrote: » This certainly doesn't pass the smell test.
Gynoid wrote: » Dog Whistles? This coming from a poster who accused a person he does not know of beating their own child into making an accusation of sexual assault, and then wishing the child is removed from her parents "into custody". Think about that. Vile. The viciousness of your demeanour towards people whose 'side you are not on' is remarkably ugly and yet you probably imagine you are the epitome of a compassionate progressive liberal. Obviously you do not understand that it is very possible to have a nuanced view of this type of thing, whereby contradictory thoughts can co exist in ones head enabling one to have a broader vision of humanity. One may both think that Mr Robinson is a snarling thug who has gone all the wrong ways about his campaign, that the subject matter that incites him is worthy of serious consideration and remedy, and that he is as enraged as any father would be had an adult man groped his little girl. All those thoughts can exist together, in an effirt to avoid black and white dogmatic thinking You on the other hand are capable only of vindictive authoritarian thought that imagines and wishes incredible evil upon a whole family, including publicly accusing a father of beating their child, because, well, he just ain't your sort.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » Not a huge fan of Robinson at all but I'll wait this one out. Because if I denied that his 8 year old girl was molested simply because I don't like him and it turned out to be true, I think its fair to say I could rightfully be regarded as the lowest form of scum imaginable without a moral leg to stand on forever on this or any other issue. I mean what type of utterly immoral, sick, depraved c*nt would I be to dismiss the molestation of an 8 year old girl over my feelings for her father. I would be akin to all those Irish people in the past who dismissed the claims of the boys being raped by clergy because the boys came from a 'bad' family.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dbba4c22aa1d352d2cdbb076e36aea8c.svg)
