WrenBoy wrote: » I'm guessing in his mind recording it and releasing it would be a way of documenting evidence and making sure its not "brushed under the carpet" as well as stopping media from spinning the info.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » You don’t have a clue what exactly the daughter said or if it’s true. Neither do I. Only one of us is being honest about what we do and do not know. If bc she made a credible accusation, then it should be investigated.
seamus wrote: » "Contentious past with media and police" is a polite way of saying that he's been in jail for a number of violent crimes and frauds, has physically threatened journalists, harrassed many, many organisations and been caught out fabricating stories about immigrants.
Tasfasdf wrote: » So if a rape victim cant prove they were raped its a lie, disgusting
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Yawn. No it isn’t. I wouldn’t believe it happened just because someone made an accusation. Would you? Honestly?
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » You might believe all victims. I don’t believe anything unless there’s enough evidence to conclude one way or the other.
Penn wrote: » I believe the girl. I don't think SYL is enough of a prick that he'd subject his daughter to making things like this up which could potentially result in her being questioned by police. For my money, she's telling the truth. But the fact that SYL and his family or whoever he was with a) videoed his daughter telling him, b) videoed him arguing with the police and c) put out his video explaining the situation to his followers is just disgusting imo.
Kristina Brief Rip-off wrote: » I thought we were “believing all victims“ these days??? How do you think it makes other victims of sexual assault feel about coming forward with comments like those.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » You have no idea whether anyone was molested. You have an accusation of molestation. You have video evidence of SYL causing a disturbance and shouting at the officers. And with nothing but an accusation you’re willing to say it probably happened. Do you usually find yourself in the #ibelieveher camp?
Gynoid wrote: » And yet usually you are such a White Knight.
seamus wrote: » What a coincidence that a well-known attention-seeking nutjob happened to catch someone in the act of molesting his daughter and was all set up to record his subsequent confrontation with the police. It couldn't be that...he's a lying dirtbag? Could it? ��
MakingMovies2 wrote: » Knowing Tommy it was probably him that did the groping. Hope the scummer gets 5 years for this, fingers crossed.
Tasfasdf wrote: » Wow this is why rape victims fail to report. Its because of people like you.
Billy Mays wrote: » Amazing coincidence that an assault like this, commited in such a public place, just so happened to be carried out by an Asian man on Tommy Robinson's daughter
Gynoid wrote: » The child probably was molested. [...] The heroes in chinos on this thread fretting for the police woman being shouted at completely ignore the reality of the festering backstory of the grooming gangs. Predictably. Whatever keeps them comfortable.
Penn wrote: » I'd say it's more likely they had proof SYL punched the guy (considering his injuries), but they didn't have proof the guy touched the girl, so that needs to be investigated before he's charged, and it should be fully and thoroughly investigated.
Gynoid wrote: » The child probably was molested. The molestor probably was allowed to walk away because the Dad was a bigger prize.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » It's neither unhinged, or "far right drivel", to point out hypocrisy. You can believe this girl without being a right-winger or believing that Tommy was correct in lashing out at him. I think most parents would understand his reaction after them having their eight year old come and tell them some man groped them in a pool. I was sceptical myself, thought he might have fed his daughter lines, but unlike some I viewed the footage before posting and it's clear that Tommy didn't do that, that he in fact gave his girl every chance to give her side and even double checked if it could have been an accident.
BanditLuke wrote: » Everything in your post suggests you indeed did imply that. Are you suggesting Robinson sat his what 8 year daughter down and coached her to imply she was sexually assaulted? What if the cameras proved otherwise he's be exposed forever and possibly serve time in jail. BTW if anything his response to the alleged offense was very subdued. I'm no hardman but if someone had touched my daughter up like that he'd be looking at more than a bloody nose.