Law000 wrote: » Anyone give a run down on AG v Hamilton..I’ve contrasting notes on what was decided so unsure about it? Thanks
CarrigView wrote: » Contract Haven't started property revision yet so not entirely sure - is it vital to have the Sale of Goods Act(s) with you for the exam? Haven't bothered to order it and wondering if I'll be leaving myself stuck in the exam? From what I can tell it seems to be the same sections coming up each year and doesn't require a word for word quote.
BlackhallPlz wrote: » Hi all Last ditch attempt to get to Blackhall in September. Could some kind soul please tell me what came up in the Company exam in October 2019? Essay or PQ. TIA
Sineaddh wrote: » my brain is melting rn... could anyone help clarify how the 1961 charities act works with the 2009 one? my manual is quoting sections of the 1961 one so im confused how they work together. Thanks!
ahhhhhFE1s wrote: » Q1- SLP- refers to holding companies and subsidiaries- E Q2- Meetings, pass sanction in three ways- E Q3- Restriction- P Q4- remedy under s 212 (oppression?) and would answer be different if constitution or shareholder agreements ok'd the conduct- P Q5- Table A- E Q6 Fixed charges not being registered and charge over book debts was registered- P Q7 Fiduciary duties to the company and to the interests of others- E Q8- Transfer of shares-P
ahhhhhFE1s wrote: » Constitutional When an essay question asks about Art 45 is it general property rights or more social policy considerations? Could you use non-justiciable cases for that ie O'Reilly v Limerick Co-operation? Very very confused
user115 wrote: » Why is the Beades v Irl decision listed in cabinet confidentiality on NBN? I saw it went to SC in 2019 was dismissed, from what I read it was about a bank loan and not sure how cabinet conf links in with it, any help welcome Also on cabinet conf in Art 15 are Oireachtas Committee's considered the legislative or the executive? Not sure if that even matter but my brain in melting for all this
iamanengine wrote: » Oireachtas Committees are part of the legislative I think, not sure if it matters, the Executive is just the government i.e. Ministers Beades is in relation to the disclosure of documents concerning cabinet discussions on greenhouse gas emissions, C held a balancing exercise should be done between the public interest served by disclosure of the material and constitutional protection for confidentiality of cabinet discussions. This was in the High Court 2016 case, I believe Beades case was dismissed in the SC in 2019 but that is irrelevant to the point re cabinet confidentiality
Breacnua wrote: » If you’re well prepared you don’t need it but was invaluable to me in last sitting when auctions were up. Got me over the line.
Sineaddh wrote: » would it be thats the 1961 Act is just being used to show the development of the law? That the law as it stands is contained wholly in the 2009 Act? or am i wrong here and the 1961 Act still applies?
LJones18 wrote: » CONSTITUTIONAL What do people think the chance of a Q on Unconstitutionally obtained evidence (DPP v JC etc.) are on coming up?
Jeremiah25 wrote: » Does anyone know if the exam reception is open tomorrow to hand in legislation or is thursday the first day it can be done? Thanks!
godfather2 wrote: » Anyone able to confirm how the injunction question came up in October sitting? Thanks
Law1997 wrote: » Here’s my situation I’m sitting Constitutional contract property & tort. I have learned all my topics at least once over the past few weeks so am just revising for Constitutional in these days leading up to the exam. However I’m extremely stressed and feel like I won’t pass the exams. I’ve only done papers for Constitutional and don’t know when I’ll have time to do all the papers for the other subjects. How do people cope in this stressful time? I feel like no one ever talks about the mental effects of these exams. Especially when your JOB depends on them.
DFMCD190384 wrote: » I absolutely completely relate with you. I'm sitting here freaking out and on the verge of throwing in the towel. Besides the stress with these exams, it's also the loneliness. Maybe I'm the only one that feels like that though.
Suzannec wrote: » Just stay calm and dont be doubting yourself. Of course you can pass them, two days to constitutional...you have the weekend to do contract, then a day to revise property (easiest exam) and then a whole weekend to cover equity. No negative thoughts.....you go this!!!!
Law1997 wrote: » Thanks so much. Half the battle of these exams is keeping calm and stop worrying but god it’s hard! Don’t know if it’s possible to revise all and know it well in a couple of days but what can I do now.
Suzannec wrote: » Its so hard, I am also freaking out but at the end of the day, they are just exams and all we can do it put in a good effort and hope for the best!
