pudzey101 wrote: » I know the feeling midnight used have a dc2 it' was some guzzler.
Wibbs wrote: » Hold me beer... Honda Integra. Just over 50 Mpg in old money. To be fair that's motorway mileage, it gets about 35 Mpg overall mixed urban/rural.
pudzey101 wrote: » What mpg are you getting ? This was a 3 hour drive this morning 90% motorway . It's a 04 Toyota Corolla 1.4 d4d I bought about 2 weeks ago as a run around. And so far its the best thing on juice I owned in the past 12 years [IMG][/img]
pudzey101 wrote: » Not bad for an integra. As I said I had a dc2 years ago , youd need the texaco garage behind u it was thirsty fun though
Midnight_EG wrote: » Jaysus my DC2 used to do about 500km to the tank with mixed driving.
pudzey101 wrote: » What make of car ? ^^^
Midnight_EG wrote: » FK8 Type R I think
CoBo55 wrote: » AHH the old Toyota stupidly optimistic display strikes again...
industry accountant wrote: » I've gotten 1,000 miles to a tank out of my 99 b5 a4 1.9tdi a couple of times, driving like an absolute granny just to see could I do it. 62 litre tank in it, filled to the brim. Roughly 72.5mpg. This was another time I got 967 miles to a tank [IMG][/img]
Fann Linn wrote: » What is that app? Thanks.
Crock Rock wrote: » The last bits of automotive imperialism were abolished in 2005 and some simpletons are still holding onto them.
Crock Rock wrote: » 6l/100km Why are people using mpg? We're a metric country. The last bits of automotive imperialism were abolished in 2005 and some simpletons are still holding onto them.
industry accountant wrote: » I'm 37 years old, I grew up using mpg and I prefer it. I could probably calculate either version in my head while you were still trying to work it out on a calculator
Crock Rock wrote: » I'm almost 29. l/100km is more logical.
colm_mcm wrote: » Wow. Nice.