tommyq94 wrote: » What are the 'trilogy of NAMA cases' that my revision guide is referring to? I am using a 2018 manual from a different College and cant find them in it. If anyone has any notes on them I would greatly appreciate them, as Property Rights is tipped to come up this sitting!
OMGWACA wrote: » Hey, can anyone clarify for me please, I have two sources, both telling me different things requirements for a valid will and witnessing. Does the testator have to sign in front of the witnesses? do they witnesses have to sign in the presence of each other at the same time? I know there's previous questions where a witness looks away when the testator is signing or someone blocks their view etc
Fe119 wrote: » Property Did someone say they had an essay prepared on the LCRA 2009 & changes that they would be willing to share? I'm reading the exam report from October 2019 and it says that it was one of the least answered questions and the answers were for the most part weak so it potentially might be worth having the bones of an essay for the exam or would it be too soon?
ahhhhhFE1s wrote: » Does proprietary estoppel come up in come in Contract much??
L.E.D wrote: » Will these exams be postponed if the coronavirus gets into the republic? I think my brain is fried from studying that I'm starting to panic!!
iamanengine wrote: » Guys I'm stressed too but we can't be wishing coronavirus on people haha I would say there is no chance of them calling it off anyway. Big difference between FE1 exams and the rugby or paddys parade, people travelling from infected countries etc, whereas FE1s don't have that factor
LJones18 wrote: » Can someone confirm that the legislative sources we bring in (Constitution , Succession etc) can be highlighted?
ahhhhhFE1s wrote: » http://www.supremecourt.ie/supremecourt/sclibrary3.nsf/(WebFiles)/3E96211DAA2B6F1C8025851A0035EF6C/$FILE/SupremeCourt_AnnualReport_2019_Online_LoRes.pdf SC Annual Report 2019 has a lot of summaries for the cases from the UCD lecture
luimneachabu73 wrote: » Property Are you allowed to bring in the LRA Explanatory Memorandum?
user115 wrote: » Equity I'm finished equity and think I am happy enough with what I am covering, I think I'm just leaving out constructive trusts and resulting, my list: - All injunctions - Rescission - Undue influence - Trusteeship - Secret trusts - 3 certainties - Charitable trusts - Cy pres - Prop Estoppel - SP -DMC -Rule in Strong v Bird - Satisfaction If I have time I might skim over rectification. Do you think I would be covered with this?
Fe119 wrote: » I'm thinking of just covering: Injunctions (all) Charitable Trusts Trusteeship Estoppel Recission Specific Performance Rectification 3 Certainties and then if I have time: Strong v Bird Presumed Resulting Trust DMC What are peoples thoughts on this? Has anyone heard of any predictions beyond the expectation of Injunctions?