JTMan wrote: » Okay, so if it is not the Business Post being disorganised, then it is deliberate, and why would they withhold the information if they are still paying the ABC, the old explanation is the figures must have been poor.
L1011 wrote: » How much longer can the print Echo survive on that? They'd be fine figures for a weekly, but...
IRE60 wrote: » Really all depends on the costs attributed to it. It could have a b/e of 3,000 copies! So it might have a bit to go yet.
The Sun recorded a loss of £68m last year amid falling print sales and the enormous cost of phone-hacking claims against its parent company from figures including Sir Elton John and Heather Mills. Rupert Murdoch’s News Group Newspapers, which publishes the Sun and retains liability for the activities of the News of the World, spent an enormous £54m on legal fees and damages related to the illegal interception of voicemails. The figures, which cover the 12 months to July 2019, were revealed in accounts filed this weekend. They show that more than a decade after the phone-hacking scandal began, the company is still spending an eighth of its revenue dealing with the fallout, as new cases involving the likes of Prince Harry continue to be filed at the high court. The Sun remains the biggest-selling print newspaper in the UK but is on track to lose that title to the Daily Mail at some point this year, as its paid circulation heads below 1.1m copies a day. This month it appointed a new leadership team of Victoria Newton as editor and Keith Poole as her deputy, with a focus on driving traffic to its website in competition with MailOnline
Muahahaha wrote: » Things not going too well at the Sun eitherhttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/feb/23/the-sun-records-huge-loss-amid-falling-print-sales-phone-hacking-damages Heading for under a million readers a day in a nation of 55 odd million when it is only a paltry 25p anyway says a lot.
doublej wrote: » Does The Irish Times have a death wish? I don’t believe that the income from her digital subscriptions comes anywhere near meeting the outgoings,yet the physical print offering is rapidly challenging the concept of value for money. The paper on Monday, at an RSP of €2.30 had a mere 20 pages. If the loyal readers of the paper, whether home delivered or bought in a shop ceased purchasing, the consequences for the IT would be ruinous.
jmcc wrote: » There have also been reports of large businesses cancelling their subscriptions to print editions and being offered replacement digital subscriptions.
JTMan wrote: » The Irish Times had 24,389 digital subscriptions on average from July to December 2019 excluding free subscriptions and the basic package. This is up from 18,903 in the comparable period in the prior year. Including free subs and the standard edition there are about 80,000 digital Irish Times subscriptions. The real number of paying digital subscriptions is somewhere in between these numbers.
The numbers are growing at a good rate. The costs attached to a digital edition are tiny versus the print edition.
But yeah still today, the print edition brings in a lot more revenue than the digital edition but things are gradually shifting.
Yeah, the paper just has 20 pages and is a mear relic of its former self. The main audience for the paper these days is the elderly who continue to purchase but their audience is literally dying.
Yeah, I heard of a large Irish company that cancelled all their print copies as part of their carbon reduction plan and replaced the editions with digital editions.
JTMan wrote: » Interesting. One would think that if money can contain the virus, that newspapers could also contain the virus of touched by a other people but the risk is probably exceptionally low.
jmcc wrote: » parallel a shift from print to digital over the next few months.