cwboy wrote: » Hi, Just added three yi cameras to our house and discovered that the eir router can only handle 16 wireless connections. How have people here got around this limit? Seems very low in this day and age where everything is connected. Thanks
cwboy wrote: » Running new cables would be difficult but I could use power line adapters. Could I just buy a new router and use the eir modem in bridge mode? How many devices would a new router manage?
donspeekinglesh wrote: » I used to have trouble when I tried to have more than 20 devices on the network when I had an Eir router, but 4 were wired. Switched to Google WiFi and now have up to 30 devices connected at any one time and no issues.
STB. wrote: » I suspect you are using the 2.4Ghz band for your cameras. Use the 5Ghz band for your other devices, like phones etc. Is the Eir router one that has the 5Ghz and 2.4Ghz bands ? Mine is. You could also get a cheap second router, Give it the LAN on the Eir, give an IP in the 100s and an SSID and run length of CAT 5 to it (up into attic maybe). Make sure your cameras connect to that.
cwboy wrote: » Dormer bungalow. Coverage ok in general but patchy in bedrooms as router in sitting room at the other end of the house
wexfordman2 wrote: » Genuinely, with a dormer bungalow there would be a way of running a few cat 6 cables about the place. Would you have a section of the attic basically that runs all the way down from one have to the next ? You would need to run just one cable up to that point, then a small switch and you can feed out to 2 APs near either Gable end. A far better solution than a single router, or Google WiFi/mesh networking. Consider mesh networking is really only extending coverage, not capacity . With an ap, for example my setup I have 2 x unifi APs. With these APs I have configured a seamless wireless network throughout the house, with 3 seperate networks as follows Wexfordman home (for all the family Wexfordman iot (for all smart devices, smart speakers, steaming devices cameras etc) Wexfordman guest (for guest access, no pwd required, but secure). All of the above work in 2ghz and 5ghz layer.
cwboy wrote: » That setup is interesting. The unifi aps are expensive enough. I have used them and know they are good. How many devices could this setup take.
wexfordman2 wrote: » The APs, go for about 90 euro each, I am estimating 2 would suffice. Don't forget that if you were to look at powerki e type solutiin, they are not that cheap either, and woefully unreliable. You could get one unifi AP so, get a really long run of cat cable and test it in different locations to see how it performs and where best to position it with reasonable access for running cable.
cwboy wrote: » Can I ask which unifi you have?
cwboy wrote: » Do you know if power is needed for the unifi or will the eir modem be able to power it via the cat 6 cable? Might try one ap and see it it covers the house. So all i need is the ap and a long run of cat 6?
cwboy wrote: » Thanks for your help. Ap and cable ordered. Looking forward to some attic crawling now!!
cwboy wrote: » I did read on amazon that the app was easier to set up than the softward. Will try that first.
Chet T16 wrote: » 16 seems an odd number. Have you many wired devices? Vodafone has a 30 device hard limit, Sky Q has 50.
lordgoat wrote: » Sorry to hijack a thread but can you connect a Unifi AP directly to an EIR router? Any details would be great
wexfordman2 wrote: » Hi, Yep, you absolutely can, that's was the first thing I did . I just got one so, and installed it. I disabled the router wifi, as it wasn't providing any additional coverage. Later i added a second so, and I upgraded to a unifi USG router at the same time.
cwboy wrote: » I bought the Unifi and have it up in the attic but the speed seems to be very poor. I have it wired back to the router with cat6. The cable run is long. Could this be showing things? I googled and that said a long run shouldn't affect speed.
wexfordman2 wrote: » The thing about these AP's , is they are OMNI antenna, so radiate ate 360 degrees, but the antenna pattern radiates outwards more than downwards, so if you have it too high, you will find the coverage underneath would be or could be fairly poor.
dam099 wrote: » Would the Unifi's not be designed to radiate downwards (as well as outwards) as they are meant for ceiling mounting? I can see being in an attic not being great on the next floor down as presume the assumed placement point in their design would be the ceiling below. I would have expected them to radiate like an upside down cone.