Mike_C wrote: » So FF say they won’t talk to SF because they said they would pre election. They also said they wouldn’t go back into gov with FG. The numbers therefore don’t add up for any minority gov so why not just call election no 2 now......see if the people really want change
Bowie wrote: » Because the people spoke. It just didn't suit FF/FG who refuse to even talk about forming a government. I get they might have their own mandate but no FG'er voted for FF the last time and that's what they got for 'stability'. Remember 'stability'? seems 'stability' is only needed if it suits FF/FG. So much for 'stability'.
woohoo!!! wrote: » There'll be another election, but the nicieties have to be observed, otherwise one risks the wrath of an electorate who are no mood for cute hoors party first shenanigans.
CtevenSrowder wrote: » There would be no stability with a FG/SinnFein government. Many feel FF/SF would collapse aswell. The only alternative is a leftwing alliance which can't happne or FF/FG. I'd take the latter.
mickdw wrote: » I don't get why SF think they have a right to government now. FF have more seats and are not crying that it's their turn. Let SF off. If they can pull a crew together - good for them, if not, someone else might. Surely FF and FG will talk, do a little side deal with a few independents then sit back and watch SF fail to gather the numbers. FF and FG likely then going together with independents to form a gov where SF failed. Another election might favour SF so FF won't want that. That said, if SF continue with the IRA nonsense, their big vote will quickly vanish.
Bowie wrote: » I'd rather no FF/FG at all but we got the results so that's not happening. They all need be adults and try hash out a middle ground in regards of the results we got when the people voted. You can't keep rolling the dice hoping you'll get a result you prefer, believe me after FG and FF before them, it would have been nice. I'm hoping this does serious damage to FF/FG.
Edgware wrote: » Does anyone seriously think that the parties want another election?" Plenty scope there for a coalition. Let them all act the flute for a few weeks and it will fall into place.
CtevenSrowder wrote: » And you think SF will move to the middle ground do you? Personally, from a slefish view-point, I'd love this left wing alliance to form as it'd be an absolute cluster ****. Can you imagine PBP being in a position to make actual decisions! Nothing would be better for both FG and FF.
Bowie wrote: » Yes I do and they all should. FF/FG are the only brats refusing to even talk.
Plumbthedepths wrote: » The last thing any of the politicians want particularly those that barely scrapped in, is another election. A plague on all your houses would be the outcome.
dxhound2005 wrote: » If they are people of principle they will put that urge for self preservation to one side, and let the electorate get the Change they really want.
dxhound2005 wrote: » The vote was on Saturday and the counting finished on Monday. Give them a chance. They managed the process in two months last time, while SF sat on the sidelines doing nothing.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » They said before the election they wouldn't be talking to SF. Now people moan that they are sticking to what they said. The election was held with everyone in full knowledge those 2 parties said they wouldn't be dealing with SF. "We want politicians to stick to their word, except when it suits us"
Grab All Association wrote: » No Fianna Fáiler would walk away from the trough that easy. They aren’t people of principle.
dxhound2005 wrote: » But they seem to be sticking to their promise that they would not go into government with SF. And getting criticised for standing by their principles.