charlietheminxx wrote: » I can't watch the video at the moment (no headphones) - can someone give me the gist?
oranbhoy67 wrote: » https://twitter.com/i/status/1227681181174575104
oranbhoy67 wrote: » I actually rang the guards after seeing the above clip and asked that she be giving a welfare check / visit, they were very glib and basically couldn't care less, made some snide remark about us all being crazy. I don't like the woman & never hidden it but I didn't ring them in badness, she genuinely does need help.
Long_Wave wrote: » The guards were right to think you are crazy too. Why are you so interested in Gemma O'Doherty anyway? What has her craziness got to do with you? Every parish in Ireland has a crazy person or two who go around the streets talking/shouting to themselves.
pinkyeye wrote: » Jesus H Christ I can't listen to more than 20 seconds of her voice. It really is the most annoying I've ever heard. :eek:
pinkyeye wrote: » But seriously, has she no family?
olestoepoke wrote: » Anyone else feel just a little bit bad for her? She obviously has some serious mental health issues and needs help.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » Apparently they've washed their hands of her
RonanG86 wrote: » "They don't want women to have babies." So what's the plan for future generations then? Cloning? Or does she mean "they don't want white women to have babies", so we'll be replaced by brown people? Because reasons.
splinter65 wrote: » This is ridiculous. People with nothing better to do are goading a seriously mentally ill woman more or less around the clock. One of the chief agitators is posting here and on twitter too. What do they want to happen? Do they want her to snap totally and maybe attack someone? If you all just blocked her then you wouldn’t have to listen to her ravings. It’s literally like watching a bear being poked by a stick. Disgusting stuff.
Stark wrote: » That's exactly what she means. She says as much in the video. "They don't want our women having babies so they can replace us with immigrants".
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » You're defending a woman that puts children's lives at risk by advocating non vaccination, I think that's more disgusting than having a laugh at her stupidity.
splinter65 wrote: » I’m not defending anyone. I’m attacking the morons who are trying to push a sick person into committing a serious crime which may involve someone being badly hurt.
O’Doherty has a small group of deluded fans who if they weren’t following her would be following some other nut job. Outside of that she’s a nobody who has zero effect on anyone.
Tell the truth. What is your objective in goading and pushing her like this? How do you think it will end up? If you’re so concerned about the anti vaxxers then what are you doing to counter the far more well known and popular ones then her? Nothing.
She’s easy pickings for keyboard bullies, that’s it. Stop pretending that you’re on some kind of crusade to protect the people from G O’D when 9 out of 10 people don’t know or care who she is.
olestoepoke wrote: » That post is definitely not defending her.
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » Can you show evidence for that? Does Gemma read this thread? She advocates for non vaccination of children, that makes her dangerous, that small group of fans could persuade others not to vaccinate. Explain how I am."goading and pushing" her. Do you think it's ok for her to scream.at people just going about their business calling them paedophiles, scumbags and criminals? How is talking about a public figure considered bullying? Have you never said a bad thing about a public figure? Politician?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » I never said the post was, I said the poster is.
olestoepoke wrote: » Erm... is that not the same thing?
Timberrrrrrrr wrote: » No.