seamus wrote: » ...why are SF trying to form a government without FF?...
jimgoose wrote: » It's politics, yes, as expounded by professional politicians, you know, all the major parties, possibly even SF. You were expecting maybe brick-laying? Dentistry? Offshore sea-angling?? :pac: Hint: Erwin Rommel didn't go about his business by running headlong for the first gap he saw.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » They didn’t even get 24 hours of happiness with the result! Back to moaning about the blueshirts. It’s glorious to watch to be honest.
jimgoose wrote: » Because there's only one group SF hates more than FG, and that's... :pac:
Yurt! wrote: » ...the heat of the media and the public will shift back to FG.
jimgoose wrote: » The pot of shit is further agitated just now, it seems Brendan Howlin has stepped down.
wench wrote: » Keyzer wrote: » Idbatterim wrote: » Now run the numbers for 101,000 , how much of the extra 1000 is deducted for tax, usc, prsi? I make it 520. So the marginal rate is over 50% There are two tax rates in this country - 20% and 40%. Then there is PRSI and USC. A salary of €120K has total deductions of €48,911 - so total deductions as a percentage of salary (including USC and PRSI) is.... 40.76% Let me explain how I got that number (which is the right number) - (48911/120000) X 100 Reason I'm continually going on about this is you, along with the other poster on this topic, are wrong but you continue to spread misinformation and nonsense when you clearly don't have a clue how to perform basic calculations. Which, in itself is bad enough, but other people believe this crap... Mind boggling...
Keyzer wrote: » Idbatterim wrote: » Now run the numbers for 101,000 , how much of the extra 1000 is deducted for tax, usc, prsi? I make it 520. So the marginal rate is over 50% There are two tax rates in this country - 20% and 40%. Then there is PRSI and USC. A salary of €120K has total deductions of €48,911 - so total deductions as a percentage of salary (including USC and PRSI) is.... 40.76% Let me explain how I got that number (which is the right number) - (48911/120000) X 100 Reason I'm continually going on about this is you, along with the other poster on this topic, are wrong but you continue to spread misinformation and nonsense when you clearly don't have a clue how to perform basic calculations. Which, in itself is bad enough, but other people believe this crap... Mind boggling...
Idbatterim wrote: » Now run the numbers for 101,000 , how much of the extra 1000 is deducted for tax, usc, prsi? I make it 520. So the marginal rate is over 50%
jimgoose wrote: » So what you're saying is, when all the faffing about and tantrums are over, everyone could well turn back to FG saying something like "Daaaad!!! Come back, the electricity is cut off and the mortgage needs paying!!" :pac:
Yurt! wrote: » Not really
jimgoose wrote: » But a bit like, right?
Yurt! wrote: » Jim, stay on topic if you can. I know it's been a difficult week for you and you have a lot of difficult emotions you're dealing with
Matt Barrett wrote: The opposite. No such thing as a blueshirt being gracious in defeat. We've been dealing with spiteful little nasty digs. I say we, meaning everyone bar FG voters it seems although I do hold out that there are genuine sorts in the FG camp. FG getting a drubbing has been akin to the Emperor's new clothes, had he never realised he wasn't wearing any. It's everything and everyone's fault except FG and their ruinous two tier policies.
Yurt! wrote: » Jim, stay on topic if you can. I know it's been a difficult week for you and you have a lot of trauma you're dealing with
Yurt! wrote: » Jim, stay on topic if you can. I know it's been a difficult week for you and you have a lot of difficult emotions you're dealing with.
solidasarock wrote: » Even if the election went to plan. I think a lot of people still expected a bumpy road ahead due to a combo of international and domestic factors. FG doing everything it can to stay out of the next GOV seems like a driver jumping out of a car moments before it drives off a cliff, and then blaming the person left in the car for not turning the wheel quick enough.
Necro wrote: » Ah yeah, pure chancers the whole lot of em. Just sat in the Dail and played checkers and the economy put itself back together without their help. Seriously though.... How about relatively decent financial governance (bar the odd major mishap like NCH)
blanch152 wrote: » If the cliff is far enough away, and the person left in the car doesn't have a clue about driving, then they will probably escape the blame.
storker wrote: Such as...?
bunderoon wrote: » SF dont have much of a chance in this anyway. FG, FF and the RTE will do everything possible to get in their way. The only ones that suffer is 'we the people'.
Mortelaro wrote: » Wrong Question You need to ask what they didn't do to ruin it and that would be try spend what we don't have
Necro wrote: » A surplus in the budget for the first time in over a decade maybe? I dunno, seems pretty fine to me.
Keyzer wrote: » There are two tax rates in this country - 20% and 40%. Then there is PRSI and USC. A salary of €120K has total deductions of €48,911 - so total deductions as a percentage of salary (including USC and PRSI) is.... 40.76% Let me explain how I got that number (which is the right number) - (48911/120000) X 100 Reason I'm continually going on about this is you, along with the other poster on this topic, are wrong but you continue to spread misinformation and nonsense when you clearly don't have a clue how to perform basic calculations. Which, in itself is bad enough, but other people believe this crap... Mind boggling...
storker wrote: That's just a question of spending cuts. Where did the extra economic activity come from? The reduction in unemployment?
Yurt! wrote: » As I suspected, it's all about party tactics and jockeying. The maths are there for a government. It's not a government I'd like, but it's there for them. FG wasted no time during the campaign telling us who they won't go to the dance with in the national interest, it will soon come time to tell us who they would be willing to go with if FF keep steady on their no SF stance. .
Necro wrote: » You seem to be describing good governance there to me :pac:
Fanny **** wrote: » The level of surplus vs the increase in tax take is pathetic (as current expenditure has simply increased to match increase in income) Increasing the old age pension by 13 euro a week under FGs watch has probably added over 100bn to the state's liabilities in future years however But like the children's hospital that's probably minor
blanch152 wrote: » It could be worse, they could have promised to reduce the pension age........oh.....
wench wrote: » And you keep missing the point that it is the marginal rate, ie, the rate you pay on the next euro of income. Once you pass on to the higher rate, half of everything else you earn goes in deductions. The table on page one here illustrates it nicely.https://www.tasc.ie/assets/files/pdf/tasc_preserving_the_41_per_cent_tax_rate.pdf