President Donald Trump - Formal Impeachment Inquiry Announced

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

2 minutes of solemn speech versus over an hour of ranting.

Yup

notobtuse wrote: »

Yup

You think that an hour of ranting is appropriate?

Okayyyyy.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

You think that an hour of ranting is appropriate?

Okayyyyy.

It certainly was entertaining to say the least (I heard some of it, but not all of it on the radio). I guess he had a few things to get off his chest. I gather witnessing the end of a witch hunt would do that kind of thing to you.

notobtuse wrote: »

But Clinton had reason to be humble and sorry for his actions... Trump didn't as he committed no crime and the House impeachment was a farce.

Don't remember any Democrats voting to remove Clinton from office.

[Deleted User]

Should have gone after him over emoluments if they were insisting on impeaching him. Going after him over Ukraine was a joke.

Sending it to the senate was a late Christmas present for Trump.

Boggles wrote: »

Don't remember any Democrats voting to remove Clinton from office.

True. Can’t explain the reason why Romney voted for the death penalty for something that at most would have warranted a speeding ticket. Hatred and jealously of Trump is the only thing I can imagine at the moment.

Deleted User wrote: »

Should have gone after him over emoluments if they were insisting on impeaching him. Going after him over Ukraine was a joke.

Sending it to the senate was a late Christmas present for Trump.

The emoluments thing was going through the court system. Verdict is now in from the court of appeals and didn’t end up as Democrats had hoped.

https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2020/02/07/appeals-court-dems-no-standing-sue-trump-emoluments-clause/

notobtuse wrote: »

True. Can’t explain the reason why Romney voted for the death penalty for something that at most would have warranted a speeding ticket.

What's this absolute irrelevance?

notobtuse wrote: »

Hatred and jealously of Trump is the only thing I can imagine at the moment.

53 Senators and only one backbone between them.

Did Romney get more votes than Trump when he ran for President?

notobtuse wrote: »

It certainly was entertaining to say the least (I heard some of it, but not all of it on the radio). I guess he had a few things to get off his chest. I gather witnessing the end of a witch hunt would do that kind of thing to you.

Entertaining you say?

Hes the POTUS ffs he isn't supposed to be "entertaining" hes supposed to be professional!

I can only imagine how "entertaining" he will be if he does lose and not get his 2and term :rolleyes:

Boggles wrote: »

Did Romney get more votes than Trump when he ran for President?

Don’t know, but it’s irrelevant. It’s electoral college votes that count.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Entertaining you say?

Hes the POTUS ffs he isn't supposed to be "entertaining" hes supposed to be professional!

I can only imagine how "entertaining" he will be if he does lose and not get his 2and term :rolleyes:

Presidents can't be people too? Did you see the SOTU? Probably the best presidential and professional (as you say) SOTU speech I've seen, ever!

If he loses, this is what I'd expect to see from him...

488226322.jpg?resize=750,500

notobtuse wrote: »

Don’t know, but it’s irrelevant. It’s electoral college votes that count.

Sure.

But more people voted for him than Trump and that was up against an extremely
popular incumbent.

Pretty impressive.

Boggles wrote: »

Sure.

But more people voted for him than Trump and that was up against an extremely
popular incumbent.

Pretty impressive.

I guess he's changed. Losing the big prize sometimes does that to people.

notobtuse wrote: »

Presidents can't be people too? Did you see the SOTU? Probably the best presidential and professional (as you say) SOTU speech I've seen, ever!

If he loses, this is what I'd expect to see from him...

I did watch it, definitely not "the best presidential and professional" SOTU speech ever. He was obviously told stick to the script for once in your life and dont mess this up, just stick to the script.

notobtuse wrote: »

I guess he's changed. Losing the big prize sometimes does that to people.

I imagine he wouldn't have been a dribbling sub servant to the Big Bad Orange Man in 2012 either to be honest.

It is the party that he is a member of that has changed, it has been hijacked and gutted and turned into King Makers.

FreeThePants

notobtuse wrote: »

I guess he's changed. Losing the big prize sometimes does that to people.

He didn't change, the Republican party just became a cult where nobody is allowed criticise or speak out against Dear Leader.

FreeThePants

Joe Walsh is the latest former Republican to say what others have been for years: the Republican party and Trumpism is nothing more than a cult.

http://wwwabcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-challenger-joe-walsh-ends-long-shot-presidential/story%3fid=67499005

He went on, "That was crystal clear to me this week when I stood in front of 3,000 Iowa Republicans and was booed and jeered at for saying we deserve a president who is honest, decent and puts the country first. The Republican party has become a cult."

FreeThePants wrote: »

Joe Walsh is the latest former Republican to say what others have been for years: the Republican party and Trumpism is nothing more than a cult.

http://wwwabcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/trump-challenger-joe-walsh-ends-long-shot-presidential/story%3fid=67499005

He went on, "That was crystal clear to me this week when I stood in front of 3,000 Iowa Republicans and was booed and jeered at for saying we deserve a president who is honest, decent and puts the country first. The Republican party has become a cult."

Loved him in the Eagles.

So Walsh now says he’d support a socialist over Trump? Well, isn’t that special. I’m confident he might get a dozen or two republicans to follow suit.

take everything

The whole Trump phenomenon reminds me nothing more than a father figure hated by rebellious children.

You either "get" Trump and what he's about or you're one of the rebellious kids, who eventually mostly grow up and admire their old man and realise yeah he's probably right about a lot of things.

Although a lot of people nowadays never leave that rebellious phase

notobtuse wrote: »

Loved him in the Eagles.

So Walsh now says he’d support a socialist over Trump? Well, isn’t that special. I’m confident he might get a dozen or two republicans to follow suit.

Vindeman fired.

So here we now see Trumps childish behaviour come to the forefront, he wants to be surrounded by yes people and nothing less will do.

All hail dear leader.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Vindeman fired.

So here we now see Trumps childish behaviour come to the forefront, he wants to be surrounded by yes people and nothing less will do.

All hail dear leader.

A president can't expect to have members of his administration who are loyal?

notobtuse wrote: »

A president can't expect to have members of his administration who are loyal?

They told the truth, they did exactly what they promised to do when they took their oath of office. Trump has had a childish hissy fit because they refused to lie for him.

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

They told the truth, they did exactly what they promised to do when they took their oath of office. Trump has had a childish hissy fit because they refused to lie for him.

His testimony only hurt the Democrats case, who called him as a key witness. But he and his brother, who was also escorted out of the White House, seemed to be part of the deep state that cared more about resisting Trump than national security. It is alleged that his brother was the one who illegally leaked Bolton’s book to the NY Times.

notobtuse wrote: »

His testimony only hurt the Democrats case, who called him as a key witness. But he and his brother, who was also escorted out of the White House, seemed to be part of the deep state that cared more about resisting Trump than national security. It is alleged that his brother was the one who illegally leaked Bolton’s book to the NY Times.

Ah would you ever stop with this nonsense! I know this is probably a strange idea to you but maybe they just had traits such as honour, integrity, and loyalty to the American people. Maybe they cherish the US constitution, the constitution that they swore to uphold and defend when they took office.

Pity your hero Trump doesn't hold such values.

FreeThePants

notobtuse wrote: »

A president can't expect to have members of his administration who will break the law for him when told, and who will cover up illegalities?

No, of course they shouldn't. Obviously.

You are mixing up the duties of those who work for cult leaders with those who work for a state.

eagle eye

Boggles wrote:

Nancy is leader of the house, she is not a potential nominee.

She is the leading figure in the Democratic party.

Boggles wrote:

Standing up to Trump and calling out his narcissistic bullshÃt is what the grass roots Democrats want.

It's what every single democrat has been doing since he took office.

It's fine to stand up to Trump and call him on all his bull.
The issue here is disrespecting the office of the POTUS and it's etiquette.

The Democrats should respect the office but not the man. What she did is disrespecting the office of the Presidency and it's not acceptable behaviour in the eyes of many.

Boggles wrote:

I'm afraid your friends would be outliers in that respect.

Have you got anything that's not from social media to show that?