Julio Wailing Page wrote: » I think people should do what makes them happy.
Always Tired wrote: » I know my last post was long enough but I just want to add that people who think like the OP annoy me a little because they are so narrow minded they can't understand it, and don't even try. I mean, I can understand easily why one would choose to be an engineer or IT guy, etc. It offers money, which equals security. If I could do that, why wouldn't I? It would be much easier than to try and struggle as an artist. (Not saying engineering or IT is easy, just easier to make money at for people who are inclined that way) It would certainly, as OP suggests, be preferable to not being able to make money off the only things I am good at, and at the same time unable to deal with the torturous conditions inflicted upon front line workers in unskilled jobs like retail, call centres, hotels/restaurants (all of which I have done for at least 2 years each btw.) This isn't the first time boards has had a thread like this, with people scoffing about creative people being entitled, wasters, etc. But do you lot not see how you could also be scoffed at for your choices? Because clearly the money and security provided to you by your practical degree or job hasn't made you happy. It hasn't softened your heart. Some of you dont even appear grateful for what you have, spending a large amount of time begrudging people with far less than you for whatever they have, gnashing your teeth about people on the dole stealing your tax and silly shìte like that. Maybe instead of asking why the artists didn't study a 'jobby' degree, ask yourself why you don't do something creative. It might make you less vindictive and petty! The most valuable resource we have is our time. So if someone wants to use it to be creative instead of doing something they arent suited to, it makes perfect sense to me. And likewise, if someone wants to work for some big company doing dull and thankless tasks and playing office politics because it allows for them to have a lot of money, I can see the appeal to that too. It certainly feels great to have lots of money. It solves a lot of problems, allows you to fill a lot of desires. I just know it's not for me. It would be nice if there were more opportunities for artists outside of the cities. Especially considering the cities are not really affordable to artists now. But unfortunately we need less of the attitude displayed in the OP for that to happen.
EmmetSpiceland wrote: » Careful now, there’s a few on here who think the “Arts” degree is the height of enlightenment and not the, giant, waste of time it actually is.
893bet wrote: » Playwright John O’Donovan’s new play Flights is on at the Project Arts Centre in Dublin until February 8th, and has its London premiere on February 11th to 29th at Omnibus Theatre. He done ok. It’s a global economy. He was never gonna stay in Clare.
con___manx1 wrote: » I know a few people who became teachers after doing an arts degree.
Fccwontletmebe wrote: Things like this really irritate me. Sense of entitlement culture.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Austerity is well known to cause catastrophic social issues, it can easily be classed as an economically dump idea, and our current situation with issues such as housing and health care are a prime example of its fcuk ups. Society requires many different types of trained and non trained individuals to function, including individuals who are seen to be non productive, not all humans are left brainers
Yurt! wrote: That's commie talk you big waster.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Hahaha thanks Now where's my free stuff!
Yurt! wrote: Shave your sideburns and get a job deleting snuff pron and be-headings from Facebook. You'll live in a bedsit in Harolds Cross with a load of Nepalese lads and you'll like it.
Fccwontletmebe wrote: » Cut welfare to food stamps and a 50 euro penny's voucher every year.
Clareman wrote: » 2009 wasn't a great year anywhere, in the mid-west Dell was after announcing that it was closing the factory BUT there was loads of minimum wage jobs available. My guess is that John thought a minimum wage in Clare was below him because he had a Masters but that was ok in London.Probably didn't help that he was straight out of college with little experience.
lozenges wrote: » He literally said in the article that he would have been happy to take a job in a shop. So presumably minimum wage. Don't get the impression he thought anything was 'beneath him'
[Deleted User] wrote: » part of the point of the thread is pointing out that you dont just rock up and get a job, even a crap one, in a recession kids, get a real degree
lozenges wrote: » I did an extremely practical degree with essentially guaranteed employment after. I still think the world would be a much poorer place if it was filled with people who did 'real degrees'. Accountants and management graduates everywhere and noone with any appreciation of classics, literature, history, languages? No thanks..
[Deleted User] wrote: » each and every IT article about the problems of generation emigration has a bang of whiney entitlement tbh who cares, lads. who cares.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I find it interesting to see how attitudes have changed. You watch reeling in the years and nobody slags off the ones emigrating. They lamented they rural towns gutted of young people. Now you see people take the p1ss out of emigrants and laugh at their sense of entitlement. FWIW, the bloke in the article has a very modest life from what I can tell. He’s glad his verdict isn’t damp or mouldy but is still branded “entitled”. Old people with houses and pensions and stable jobs for life with gratanter wage growth over the years, would Sh1t a brick if they had to live like a modern young person. Zero hour contracts wages not even matching inflation for lower paid, no job security, paying such high rent (to older people to top up their earnings) no reasonable prospect of buying a home or starting a family. Genuinely interesting to see how the young today are the public punching bag for everyone to take out their frustration on. It’s no wonder the young people put up with it. It’s all they’ve ever known.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I find it interesting to see how attitudes have changed. You watch reeling in the years and nobody slags off the ones emigrating. They lamented they rural towns gutted of young people. Now you see people take the p1ss out of emigrants and laugh at their sense of entitlement. FWIW, the bloke in the article has a very modest life from what I can tell. He’s glad his bed sit isn’t damp or mouldy, works a part time paid job plus unpaid internships but is still branded “entitled”. Old people with houses and pensions and stable jobs for life with steady wage growth over the years, would Sh1t a brick if they had to live like a modern young person. Zero hour contracts wages not even matching inflation for lower paid, no job security, paying such high rent (to older people to top up their earnings) no pension to look forward to and no reasonable prospect of buying a home or starting a family. Genuinely interesting to see how the young today are the public punching bag for everyone to take out their frustration on. It’s no wonder the young people put up with it. It’s all they’ve ever known.
mariaalice wrote: » Disagree with you mostly but there is a bit of dumbing down on the young going on. Its to do with lack of reticence and the slight woe is my tone of some of the articles versus the just getting on with it life of the older generation. Unemployment was 20% in the 1980s and pla lived in damp dangerous accommodation.
marieholmfan wrote: » Think he's doing alright. Poor as a churchmouse but writing plays and having one produced. Obviously no interest in Dublin so he went to London. He's doing OK.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » What specifically do you disagree with? The bloke IS ‘getting on with it’. He’s working a paid job part time ABD working jobs for free to get experience. Did many of the ones in the 80s expect to work for free when they emigrated? Would the 80s construction workers ever offer work a hod carrier for 6 months for free? But this bloke is entitled. He is grateful for his modest life without damp or mould in his bed sit, but still he’s entitled. Entitled to what? What does he think he’s entitled to? He doesn't think he’s entitled to be paid for his work, he doesn’t think he’s entitled to a job at all. He doesn’t think he’s entitled to a lavish lifestyle. So what do you think he’s claiming entitlement to? The only entitlement I see is when a young person expresses their concerns, an entitlement to slag them off and put them down. So, to what does the bloke imply he’s entitled?