perrito caliente wrote: » I don't understand. Why does he dismiss the feelings of gays? What gives him the right??
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » He’s from a different era so probably doesn’t even realise what he’s saying.
elefant wrote: » I honestly didn't even know the term had homophobic connotations. I thought it was just used for slagging someone acting delicate or soft.
Bambi wrote: » I knew the moment he said it there's be outraged whingers reaching for their smelling salts on twitter. Buncha big girls blouses.
jimgoose wrote: » "Namby-pamby pansy boy" has nothing to do with gays, it's just a figure of speech for cosseted, effeminate, ineffectual gameplay. Ya big Jessie!
Better Than Christ wrote: » Pansy - Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. a contemptuous term used to refer to a male homosexual. I'm sure he didn't deliberately set out to say anything homophobic. His comment in its entirety is a good example of toxic masculinity though - the idea that effeminate = inferior. Disappointing attitude from a school principal.
enricoh wrote: » David Gough the ref outraged over it on Twitter, naturally. God bless Twitter outrage, we'd be lost without it!
jimgoose wrote: » I see you quote one of two slang usages that suits your particular opinion, as one does.
jimgoose wrote: » And effeminate in this context is inferior on a hurling field. And before you reply with something about ladies GAA, I know all about it, and their gameplay is not effeminate. "Toxic masculinity", in the name a' Jaysis...
Better Than Christ wrote: » You said the term had "nothing to do with gays". I was merely pointing out that you were wrong, whilst also acknowledging that his intent was probably not homophobic. He's an educated man. I'm sure it's possible to refer to sporting inadequacies without using the language of toxic masculinity.
jimgoose wrote: » It actually hurts at this stage, reading this sort of scutter.
Itssoeasy wrote: » I doubt he meant it as a homophobic slur. Intent and context seem to have gone the way of the dodo. The funniest thing about this whole faux offended( a opposed to legitimate offense ) is when a celebrity for example get called something or something is said about them and said celebrity doesn't take offence to it. It's funny to see the terminally offended not be able to grasp the fact that celebrity X isn't offended. My worry is that because there is a mentality of being permanently offended that the moment of actual offense will be washed out and not picked up and rightly called out.
Better Than Christ wrote: » Maybe read a bit more about the concept of toxic masculinity, albeit with a less incurious mindset. A bit of learning might alleviate the pain.
jimgoose wrote: » I know exactly what it is.