user115 wrote: » Constitutional Question My manual is kind of confusing when I'm comparing with my grid. What chapter is fair procedures? Is it part of due process or is it unspecified rights? My grid says it comes up alot but it seems to be under both due process and unspecified rights in manual. Be grateful if anyone can explain which one comes up frequently, thanks!
user115 wrote: » Hi, Was anyone at the UCD constitutional law update session and want to share what cases they discussed? I wasn't able to make it so it would really help me out. Happy to swap material if you want to trade stuff for it
iamanengine wrote: » I was confused about this as well but I think I figured it out. Fair Procedure seems to be interchangeable with Natural Justice so it might be down as that. In the Independent Manual it's the last section in Personal Rights.
scooby321 wrote: » Constitutional Anyone who sat the October '19 Constitutional paper and passed Question 1 (Re: Diesel Fuels Ltd), could you please explain the topics it considered? I answered it including the issue of the Agency having the same protections as the Oireachtas per Kerins (2019), then questioned was it acting ultra vires its powers using the non-delegation doctrine, the issue of s.8 being a criminal offence encroaching on judicial territory and distinguishing executive and judicial powers per McCrystal and when court will intervene in extreme circumstances. Then considered right to a good name for the "name and shame". Then considered due process Art.38.1 as the Agency initiated criminal prosecution and said it breached SOP. And ended with considering whether or not it was a criminal matter per Mathghamhna and if it was its for the courts and not the agency so said Diesel Fuels would likely be successful because of that. I failed the question miserably and still don't understand what I should have mentioned. Any help would be much much appreciated.
Blue_pens17 wrote: » Hey, does anyone know what the pass rate is like for Constitutional? Doesn't appear in the exam reports...
EAA123 wrote: » Does anyone have a copy of the equity paper from October 2019? can swap for tort
rightytighty wrote: » Just got the email from the Law Society about carrying forward passes from before the rules changed for this sitting. If they’ve accepted some already as I’ve read they have, you’d wonder on what basis they can then refuse applications?
JimmyJazzz wrote: » I'm also curious about this if anyone can shed some light?
spygirl wrote: » I haven't heard of anyone who was refused once they applied for the exemption. Maybe someone else could confirm if they had a request to carry over refused. I have not heard of one yet. I know people who carried just one pass, and some who have carried from March 2018 sitting.
jus_me wrote: » In an ABSOLUTE panic. Realised I missed the deadline to submit my application... will they still accept it? Has anyone applied late? All advice welcome
EAA123 wrote: » Hi I have contract stuff and I am looking for equity ?
sm333 wrote: » Hi all On my (HOPEFULLY) last sitting and worried about topics for Constitutional as I really need to pass this round. Would I be save with; SOP, Interpretation, property rights, equality, family, JR + Unconstitutionally, amending Constitution, freedom of expression/assembly/expression, President/AG. Obviously you can never be certain but is this along the lines of what people are covering? Thanks!!
Lcork23 wrote: » Hi Guys, Does anyone know what came up in property October 2019? Also, would anyone have any tips out what you could possibly leave out topic wise?
