Bob24 wrote: » So Peter Schiff has reluctantly admitted what was obvious at first glance: that losing access to his bitcoins was due to human mistake on his part ... not newsworthy but entertaining :-)https://twitter.com/peterschiff/status/1220135541330542592?s=21https://twitter.com/peterschiff/status/1220137968343580672?s=21
Lex Luthor wrote: » he's just giving Bitcoin more publicity, whether he thinks its hurting it or not
makeorbrake wrote: » He's also building his profile, etc. There's no such thing as bad publicity.
JohnnyFlash wrote: » Goldbugs and crypto heads have an awful lot in common. The boner for ‘hard money’, libertarian woo, a mistrust of Government, the need to constantly shill their ‘investment’.
Dohnjoe wrote: » Well, in fairness, the dollar is just about to collapse any day now, so you should really load up on gold/crypto to survive the ensuing dystopia
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » Rejected again. People can say all they want about TA but it's clearly relevant. Helps predict volatility if nothing else.
Bob24 wrote: » Yes, basically TA should be seen as something which works until it doesn’t. Once you are in a pattern it is likely to work for a while, but of course patterns don’t have to last forever and a change of circumstances can break them unexpectedly.
Lex Luthor wrote: » $9500 being tested
Addison Fancy Macrame wrote: » very little resistance above this generally speaking.