DeanAustin wrote: » Isn't homelessness on the decrease? Not by a lot but I thought I heard Murphy say it was coming down last week.
tacofries wrote: » Voted Fg last time but realistically they were a disaster in the sense that homelessness is at an all time high, there is a total housing and rental crisis and healthcare has gone down hill all despite huge tax intakes. Really wanted to see MM step up here but he's too week, Leo can hold a crowd but his record says no matter how good he can talk, the country isn't benefiting from it and Mary Lou who can also talk stands for a party that are massively over promising and are unrealistic in what they want to do. More confused than ever on who to go for!
_Kaiser_ wrote: » Disagree. I have found it a really worthwhile debate to be honest - largely down to Claire keeping them (mostly) in order and calling them out where necessary
Lundstram wrote: » Blocking up the M50 in their 191 John Deeres worth about €70k. My heart bleeds. :rolleyes:
passremarkable wrote: » Claire wins
James Forde wrote: » Who “won” in your opinion?
Deleted User wrote: » They done the right thing. These people are spending years rearing beef herds to receive a paltry price for their efforts. They had to do something to for the government to stand up and notice. I realise it must be frustrating to be stuck on the m50 fair enough, but sometimes it takes drastic action.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » What have they done for the taxpayer in the last 3 years? Is a fiver a week (offset against more expensive charges) really something to be championing? Why will they be different next month if they're elected? What's changed?
hotmail.com wrote: » It's not over yet!