simongurnick wrote: » That's crazy
Mellor wrote: » Out of curiosity, why? If they both made the cut to 156 and then rehydrated back to whatever wait they walked at. What difference would it make?
RoryMac wrote: » What would be the point of weight classes if some fighters can skip the weight cut to get into contention for a title shot but others have to break their bollíx to make weight? Should be a level playing field for all, if you want a title shot at a weight you earn it at that weight imo.
The Nal wrote: » Dana will put Conor in wherever he can. Since the Khabib fight which did 2.4m PPV buys 3 PPV buys in 2019 (I know ESPN obscures it somewhat). UFC 234 Silva vs. Adesanya 175,000 UFC 235 Jones vs. Smith 650,000 UFC 236 Holloway vs. Poirier 2 100,000 UFC 246 McGregor vs Cerrone 2,000,000
yourdeadwright wrote: » This should be the be way but UFC is not about who is the best fighter its about making the UFC money , What ever way they can manipulate fights or fighter without going to far (fixing fights ) to make sure the real money fights happen they will do it Unfortunately when it was sold for what 4 Billion ? this was always the road it was going down , for god sake they make up belts to sell pay per views ,
ChrisM wrote: » Who would McGregor fight though, Tony for the belt or Khabib for revenge? ?
Tazzimus wrote: » For fighters "breaking their bollix" to make the weight limit, they should probably look at a higher weight class. 155 fighters are generally around the 170 mark on the night of the fight, so I don't see what the issue is. It's not like he's fighting at 205 and asking for a 155 shot. Plus, he's always made weight regardless of what class. Possibly even made championship weight each time, not 100% on that though.
EagererBeaver wrote: » Are the other numbers "adjusted" to account for the new ESPN model the way the (almost certainly bull****) 2m number has for UFC 246? .
RoryMac wrote: » And I don't really have an issue with making the big money fights, if Jon Jones wants to step up to HW to fight for the title, great. McGregor stepping up to fight for the WW belt, great. If Masvidal vs McGregor is going make a ton of money, great. But a McGregor vs Gaethje fight at WW when both are vying for a LW shot seems pointless when both are well capable of making LW
GiftofGab wrote: » Hard to believe Poirier vs Holloway did over 2m+. Crazy if true but some of boxings biggest fights didn't do that much.
RoryMac wrote: » What would be the point of weight classes if some fighters can skip the weight cut to get into contention for a title shot but others have to break their bollíx to make weight?
But I do agree, a lot more should be done to avoid fighters making huge weight cuts for fights
Mellor wrote: » The point of weight classes is to match fighters based on body mass for a given fight. This doesn’t change that. Weight classes have nothing to do with making a fighter break their bollox. That’s simply an unfortunate side effect of the current system. It’s pretty universally agreed that the weight cutting system is one if the worst aspects of the sport. When two fighters agree to not cut, it’s usually held up as a good thing. I don’t think they should suffer consequences for doing that. Obviously, fighters can’t constantly operate with that gentlemen’s agreement, as they’d just creep up in weight. But once every few fights I’m ok with. Maybe the fight us booked without the guarantee of the agreement. Which kinda contradicts what you say above.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » https://twitter.com/TheNotoriousMMA/status/1221266981438935045
Ush1 wrote: » The point of titles is that they correlate with a weight class. Also rankings etc..
Mellor wrote: » I wasn’t suggesting that anyone shouldn’t make weight for a title fight. But for non title fights I’m ok with it. As you said, that fight was two LWs not two WWs. I mean, if two fighters both weight around 170 a week out. And will weigh 170 in the cage. What’s difference does the cut to 155 a day out actually achieve? Nothing. It’s just there to keep fighters in check
Ush1 wrote: » That's always been the point of weight classes.
I'm not talking about the point of weight cutting, it achieves nothing in terms of a title fight either if we're going that way.
But rankings and titles are based on the weight class you weigh in at, not your actual weight. Just because some people say McGregor is a lightweight and Gaethje is a lightweight, doesn't have any meaning if they are constantly weighing in at 170lbs does it?
Ush1 wrote: » Just because some people say McGregor is a lightweight and Gaethje is a lightweight, doesn't have any meaning if they are constantly weighing in at 170lbs does it?
Mellor wrote: » In regards to “constantly weighing in at 170”, it’s happened once so far. And as I said fighters can’t be agreeing not to cut every fight.
Tazzimus wrote: » I don't really see the issue here to be honest. Everyone knows that they only weight 155 for that morning of the weigh in, and are back to pretty much their normal weight come fight night, which is usually around 170. If we know they're going to weigh 170, why is there an issue with them deciding to not dehydrate themselves, especially for a non title fight. Title fight, fair enough, it's for a title. Although I don't agree with weight cuts at all and would love if they were done away with. That way everyone would/should be competing in their natural weight division.
Ush1 wrote: » So should every non title fight be at a weight class above what the fighter will fight for a title at? If it was that across the board I could see some sort of logic. The weight cut will effect you, positively or negatively eventually. If that's for a normal fight or for a title fight. It changes the dynamic of the whole division. Maybe Cowboy would have beat Conor at 155lbs?(I don't actually believe this)
Mellor wrote: » I understand that’s the point of weight classes.Somebody above had the ludicrous idea it’s about making a fighter break his bollox.