Hammer89 wrote: » Oh god you're not doing anything about it lol. Being very rude to a stranger and treating her like a child isn't going to make her not flick cigarettes away in the future. Take it from me, you were the asshole in that situation, not her. And I'm sorry to tell you that you didn't make a blind bit of difference in that situation, nor have you made any difference in this situation. You don't care about the environment. Give me your shopping list and your make of car and I guarantee I'll find a way in which to argue you're harming the environment, just in a different way. Because guess what, we all are! Every single one of us is guilty one way or the other because it turns out quite a lot of things are harmful to the planet. I'd bet a million euro you eat fish and here you are berating smokers for murdering sea creatures with their cigarette butts. I'm certain this is a multi-layered hypocrisy on your part.
Hammer89 wrote: » No it's more of a case of you having the cheek to lecture people about the environment without realising you more than likely contribute to the destruction of it in other ways. Or are you squeaky clean in this respect? Do you line-dry your clothes instead of using a tumble dryer? Do you cycle everywhere instead of driving or getting the bus? Do you eat meat? Is your central heating on a timer or is it liable to stay on a bit longer than it needs to be sometimes? Do you compost your food waste? If the answer to any of these is 'no' then you honestly don't have a leg to stand on pal. And that's precisely my point. We live on a planet where it's virtually impossible for any first-world human being not to damage it in some way. If you want to gloss over that fact well then I'd suggest you're far more ignorant than I am.
pgj2015 wrote: » https://www.dailyedge.ie/gerald-kean-operation-transformation-2980324-Sep2016/ like this guy.
cjmc wrote: » I was guilty of this. It was a habit. But thanks to this thread I now see it for what it is. Disgusting littering. Now if I smoke in the car ( rarely ) I flick the lit bit off and dump the filter in a bin when I'm near one. Thanks boards
LirW wrote: » But the solution for disposing of buds is putting it into a bin, super simple, super preventable without having to question societal and political values and incompetence.
Hammer89 wrote: » That's only the solution if you're near a bin. If you aren't near a bin you have three options: a) throw it away b) walk until you find a bin or c) put it in your pocket. Would you walk to find a bin if you were a smoker? I don't think so, and you absolutely wouldn't put it in your pocket until you find one later because you'd stink to high heaven. Cigarette butts themselves smell worse than the smoke. If any of you were smokers you would do the exact same as many more smokers if there was no receptacle, which is drop it on the f*cking ground and stamp on it, or flick it away. I guarantee it.
Stateofyou wrote: » I absolutely take steps where I can to reduce my footprint.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » If you're able to remember to carry your smokes and your lighter with you, then you're able to remember to carry an ashtray with you. Clean up after yourself.
Hammer89 wrote: » I don't believe you. I don't believe you would sacrifice the convenience of a tumble-dryer, for example, just to lower your carbon footprint. I just don't buy this boyscout act I'm afraid. I think you're just making stuff up as you go along. Want proof? Today you wrote: "Behave like a child, you get treated like a child." Last week you wrote: "Treat people like infants and they'll resent their employer and find ways around it." Verbatim. So do you reduce your footprint or did you just make it up on the spot in response to what was a very good point? Could you do more to reduce your footprint? If so then why exactly are you calling me lazy and questioning my attitude. Maybe I'm not the one who needs a good look in the mirror. At least I know my stance on things.
ReginaldSmythV wrote: » You’re not going to avoid one yourself.
Hammer89 wrote: » Interesting that I effectively said you were lying when you claimed to reduce your footprint where you can and you didn't deny it. I'd rather be lazy and have a bad attitude than be a liar and a hypocrite.
Hammer89 wrote: » As an experiment, I'd invite all the sanctimonious non-smokers in here to take up eating 10 chewing gums a day for the next month and if you dispose of every single one of them in the correct manner - i.e putting them in a bin of some description - then I'd be extremely impressed. I genuinely would be, because there will be times when you're nowhere near a bin and the smaller something is, the more you can rationalise the 'littering' of it. And instead of putting it into your pocket or carrying it around with you until you find a bin, all of you will be tempted to litter and most of you will succumb to it out of sheer convenience. I promise you.
AndrewJRenko wrote: » It looks like this is going to be a big surprise to you, but most decent people don't litter. They make other arrangements, however inconvenient that is for them.
cajonlardo wrote: » Still digging? Even after you have been shown a video of a biker with 3rd degree burns all over his torso and arms because a half wit decided to flick a butt out the window? No point engaging further so.
dark crystal wrote: » They stopped putting ash trays in cars years ago. What else are they supposed to do with a lit cigarette? I suppose they could have a bottle of water in the car or something for cigarette waste. If you don't have an extinguishable in the car, I guess throwing them away is the only option.
Hammer89 wrote: » Well then do what I suggested Andrew and we'll see how decent you are when you have to discard something very small between 10-15 times a day in public. Believe me, on some occasions you're not going to go out of your way to find a bin if there isn't one nearby. On some occasion you will litter it because it's the most convenient solution at that time. Do the experiment.