Luca Nervous Bride wrote: » It seems to be a common trait in the UK and the US as well. Familiarity with a language seems to lead to complacency.
MrAbyss wrote: » As bad as that is, I have seen advertising graphic posters for products on bus stops and the DART with 'its the one you want.' and 'comes with it's own monitor'. These were big ad accounts and no one in the agency caught it.
One eyed Jack wrote: » I’m trying to figure out what’s wrong with the examples given above?
KiKi III wrote: » I explained to a friend of mine the other day that “should of” is not a real phrase. I had to go into detail on how it’s a mishearing of “should’ve”. He has a degree from trinity.
MrAbyss wrote: » No it isn't. Not to the degree you see here. Educated Americans I found had excellent English writing skills. Apart from their phobia for the letter 'u'.
MrAbyss wrote: » I used to work for a pensions company and most of the clients were semi-literate at best. Again. All degrees.
Cordell wrote: » Your joking.
Alun wrote: » Seriously?
One eyed Jack wrote: » Unfortunately, yes. I’ve searched on google for the correct use of its and it’s in various different contexts, and it didn’t give me any better indication of appropriate use of either, or why the OP’s examples were incorrect.
Luca Nervous Bride wrote: » It’s is a contraction of it is or it has. Its is the possessive form of it. The confusion is because, with most other words, ‘s indicates possession.
Luca Nervous Bride wrote: » Formal teaching of grammar has slipped dramatically plus there is a tenancy to simply accept the errors nowadays, rather than pull somebody up on it. Even try it here and you'll be carded for being a grammar Nazi - you can't win!
somefeen wrote: » Then we can't accept your error here. :P Tendency
MrAbyss wrote: » The education system in Ireland is shocking. When I was growing up you had RTE and politicians claiming it was greatest in the world FFS lol.