jr86 wrote: » Yeah I think January is just way too early in the year for it I always associate elite events with being well into the season in a given sport. I personally don't understand a major tournament taking place only a few weeks into a new season. Would personally like them to be scheduled much more like the golf
Floppybits wrote: » Probably the reason for the AO in January is because it is the Australian summer. It probably could be moved to either November or February/March.
whiterebel wrote: » And Millman breaks in the 5th. Millman must be superfit, he's played doubles as well this week.
Hector Savage wrote: » Didn't know they have a final set tiebreak at 6-6 now at AO. Is that new this year ? So French is the only one now where in theory it can go to 100-100 ....
josip wrote: » So will a 5 setter at this stage of the tournament be a positive or a negative for Federer? ie a decent bit of practice or the 38 year old would have preferred to conserve energy for the 2nd week?
jr86 wrote: » Yeah no harm for the women's game. Serena is 38 now and anytime I've seen her since her return she's looked unfit and ponderous out on court. It was an almighty travesty she made a Wimbledon final last year with the condition she was in, but luckily Halep absolutely hockeyed her A legend of the game obviously but I don't think its a good look if a 38 year old way past her pomp is simply powering her way to slams. Even leaving all that aside, her classless celebrations when she wins a run of the mill point against a no-hoper, her antics in all those infamous US open finals, yeah I won't be sorry if she never wins another slam, she's won more than enough anyway
yerwanthere123 wrote: » I want her to beat Court's 'record' but I can't root for her either, so it's a weird catch-22. I mean Serena isn't a very nice person but Margaret Court is repulsive.