mickwat155 wrote: » Just noticed hunters coal has shut up shop down at at the quays or maybe they moved?
curtisbrown wrote: » Streetcart closed this week
mano79 wrote: » They are looking for a new premises. Couldn’t get their lease renewed
tommyamnesia wrote: » Crozon Inn closing. Tonight is the last night.
Geuze wrote: » Given the massive rent of 45,000 pa, I'm not surprised.
mickwat155 wrote: » Lazat is gone on Grattan street
EmptyTree wrote: » What a ridiculous price. That number really must have been plucked out of the air. I hope the owner enjoys having his building back..... Empty
Andy From Sligo wrote: » I dont really know the ins and outs on tax on property but most probably saves a good portion of tax breaks now its empty. I think that was the score the last time i asked someone why there were so many empty shop/buildings .. of course though it could all be rumours and hearsay
TheKBizzle wrote: » Sweet Beat and Sweet As both closed down. Bailiffs were in yesterday apparently
littlejp wrote: » Seriously???
shanec1928 wrote: » https://www.sweetas.ie/
milli milli wrote: » That’s very sad news about Sweet Beat & Sweet As. They will definitely be missed. Although I often wondered how the owner could pay all the staff for the two cafes - you’d want to be making serious turnover to pay everyone (15 in Sweet Beat and 12 in Sweet As - figures gotten from interviews). Do you reckon it was mismanagement? Because the food itself and marketing of the establishment can’t be faulted.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » That doesn't make any sense. If they're not taking in any rent then they don't pay tax as there is no profit. However, there is still no profit.
clubberlang12 wrote: » Not really, you are looking at 1 property in isolation. Businesses often buy properties to reduce their taxable profit, thus paying less tax(if any at all), but acquiring an asset. That may come from a company profits or a loan which can still be claimed against their tax liability. Even if the property(s) sit empty, they are still increasing in value in the current market and so are an investment. Potentially if rented out, they may go over the tax liability threshold and result in them paying more tax than what the rent would be worth to them. If they thought they were losing out...........they would be rented out!! The only way to stem the tide of unused commercial building is to make landlords( be it private businesses, banks or investment fund businesses) liable for rates on empty units. It won't be long till you see more appeasing rental costs then.
AlmightyCushion wrote: » I'm not a tax accountant so I may be wrong but none of that makes any sense. There is no way that increasing your income results in that business paying more tax than the extra income generates. You will pay more tax because you profits are higher but you will still have more after tax profits by renting out the property than by not renting it out.
prodsc wrote: » Sign on Sweet Beat window says Closed for Renovations!! Looked like things were being packed up..shame to see it close!