KWAG2019 wrote: » Instead, you get wolves.
emo72 wrote: » FG turned nothing around. The Troika did.
Snow Garden wrote: » No, I wont have that utter nonsense. FG only implemented the existing IMF/FF policies - it was the hard working and resilient people of Ireland!
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » As non new builds none of these qualify for HTB and are all likely to cost a fortune to bring into line with the new building standards. Quite a bit of the housing stock built under the old regime is absolutely falling down and I've heard enough horror stories to not get involved with one.
hots wrote: » You're limiting yourself massively if you're going for new-only. You've got enough buying power to get somewhere nice in Dublin.
suicide_circus wrote: » the greens need to go for more carrot than stick; massive investment in public transport and big grants for home insulation and electric vehicles and i'd throw them a number 1.
endainoz wrote: » I remember maybe two or three elections ago, boards did a mock election that you could give your preference for your constituency. As I recall they were fairly accurate, but don't remember seeing it since, any chance of it being done this time around?
blanch152 wrote: » All of that will be part of their election manifesto.
jam_mac_jam wrote: » I think you overestimate the voters. FF will promise cake and people love cake. They will vote for them forgetting everything that happened and imagine that it was a global financial crisis and FF did nothing.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » TBH I hadn't really looked because of the HTB money but I will now and see what I think.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Totally agree. But the Health Service is not a TOTAL shambles either IMV. Certain areas are like A+E and waiting lists for elective procedures. But the failures are highlighted all the time. My late mother was constantly in and out of a public hospital and I can genuinely say that her care was exemplary. Just for a bit of balance like.
Snow Garden wrote: » O'Dowd is a thorn in FGs side. I am surprised they kept him. He exposed the Irish Water privatisation plan. O'Cuiv is an absolute dose. I hope he steps away. Fairly quiet these days.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » Most recent search on MyHome.ie for new builds under €300k in Dublin is showing duplex's in Saggart (which is still an hour from Dublin) and the second phase of Priory Hall, yeah this Priory Hall:https://www.thejournal.ie/priory-hall-whats-happening-1067402-Sep2013/ If you expect me to make apologies for wanting a bit more than that from a home I'll spend 20 years in I'm afraid I will have to disappoint you.
[Deleted User] wrote: » If they are to shoulder the blame for the ills of the country, then they should also be given the kudos for the things which went well. You can't say X is bad it's all their fault but Y is good and they had nothing to do with it.
blanch152 wrote: » Actually, they were far from accurate, completely overestimated the support for Sinn Fein and AAA-PBP, while underestimating the support for Fianna Fail.
Matt Barrett wrote: » That's not true. They'll remember. Then they'll remember Kenny promising to change the way we do business. Then they'll remember getting the blame while the folk had a part in causing it got away with it pretty much unscathed and are back making their millions. Then they'll be fully aware of the Insurance, housing and health situations. The wastes and over runs and the scandals, (Murphy, Bailey, Farrell etc.) and they'll weigh the two and likely be more inclined towards FF, because they didn't have record breaking crises under FF even if FF played their role. And FF will look after the tax payer better than FG did. The thing is 'freebies' are no bother for vulture funds and the like under FG, but doing same for the tax payer is foolishness. Well neither are very good, but with one a working tax payer might be able to house him or her self.
bubblypop wrote: » If there's any chance of FF going into government with SF, then they won't get a vote from me. The last time the greens were in they forced everyone in the country to buy new diesel cars..... Now look. The greens will tax everything in the name of climate change, which has no affect on climate change........It's a pity the soc dems are such a small party, few more candidates for them, I think they would do well
bubblypop wrote: » If there's any chance of FF going into government with SF, then they won't get a vote from me. The last time the greens were in they forced everyone in the country to buy new diesel cars..... Now look. The greens will tax everything in the name of climate change, which has no affect on climate change........ It's a pity the soc dems are such a small party, few more candidates for them, I think they would do well
is_that_so wrote: » Hmm, very few of these are likely to resonate. What people around these parts tend to forget is the utter disinterest of an average person in political machinations. This kind of a post is a wishful thinking that they would think the same way.
bubblypop wrote: » It's a pity the soc dems are such a small party, few more candidates for them, I think they would do well
blanch152 wrote: » Oh, the short memories. We had a world record-breaking budget deficit of 32% of GDP in 2010 caused by Fianna Fail. Everything else about the last decade comes down to that, everything else.
Matt Barrett wrote: » Quite the opposite. These are issues I would imagine foremost in the publics mind. I would not envy FG trying to sell the economy to punters unable to buy a house or small businesses getting run out over insurance costs. And the personnel scandals and NCH are bigger issues than FG might think. The RIC/Tan commemoration won't help either.
is_that_so wrote: » A lot of these are media-driven outrage. NCH will deliver a hospital and it seems that voters accept government can't keep projects in budget. Insurance may rear its head and housing but I'd be very surprised if the commemoration causes much of a ripple, save in people who were out to be offended by it anyway. What I do think they will be thinking is whether a two term government party should get the chance of a third one. Pre-2010 that would have been a given but with the stain on the other option it's hard to say. It will all be down to the campaign. I'd say it will be clear enough before we hit the final week of campaigning.
is_that_so wrote: » A lot of these are media-driven outrage. NCH will deliver a hospital and it seems that voters accept government can't keep projects in budget. Insurance may rear its head and housing but I'd be very surprised if the commemoration causes much of a ripple, save in people who were out to be offended by it anyway. What I do think they will be thinking is whether a two term government party should get the chance of a third one. Pre-2010 that would have been a given but with the stain on the other option it's hard to say. It will all be down to the campaign. The way they may do it is just by swapping preferences about so that the FGs are mostly below the FFs. I'd say it will be clear enough before we hit the final week of campaigning.
Dwarf.Shortage wrote: » Having had a good look at Daft.ie I'm happy to concede the HTB scheme may have seduced me and €20k subsidy or not going used might be a better idea. I maintain there are substantial risks to buying anything built 5 or more years ago as a lot of that stock was built to an absolutely deplorable standard but it's certainly a more live option than I thought. I say this as someone with a lot of family members making a living fixing the issues with these houses/apartments so I've heard it from the coalface.